brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
johnknight at usa.com
Mon Jul 29 11:15:45 EST 2002
"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:eP519.36903$Fq6.3611613 at news2.west.cox.net...
> "Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
> news:q3h9kug6pppa6d80usttnv8ruhcm67mggq at 4ax.com...
> > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
> > >Consider the two following contradictory statements which *cannot* both
> > >true:
> > If you understood English and did not edit my writing, then you would
> > problem.
> It's an insult to the language to call what you "liberals" do to massacre
> > >> > I don't believe that anyone but God
> > >> >is authorized to judge what is in our hearts
> > >
> > >VERSUS
> > >
> > >> >Only explicit denial of Christ's divinity is
> > >> >sufficient for me to reject someone who says he is a Christian as
> > >really
> > >> >being Christian (e.g. Thomas Jefferson)
> > Finish the sentence, nincompoop:
> > >and even then I don't presume that God approves of my making that
> You're digging this hole even deeper. How deep are you going to dig it?
> > >Mr. Jefferson wrote in his own hand "I am a real Christian", this IDIOT
> > >"liberal" claims that only "God is authorized to judge", and then
> > >to JUDGE Mr. Jefferson.
> > And I specifically say that God may not approve of my making that
> la, de, .ucking, da.
> Did Ariel Sharon drop the bombs first and then claim "God may not approve
> my" killing 19 innocent civilians, or did he think about what God may
> before he killed them?
> Your "qualifier" is as meaningless as Sharon's would have been in this
> Either you LIVE by what you pretend to be your "moral code", or admit that
> you're too amoral to even think about irritants like morals.
> > >YOU AIN'T GOD, YOU STUPID "liberal",
> > Did I say I was? No!
> No? You said "I don't believe that anyone but God is authorized to judge
> what is in our hearts", and then immediately followed that up with what
> think was in Mr. Jefferson's heart. You're dead wrong about Mr. Jefferson
> anyway, your pseudo-qualifier was disingenuous, and furthermore it was YOU
> who raised this to "[only] God is authorized" just so you could
> run around playing God.
> John Knight
Being a "liberal" means having a "moral code" which everyone but a "liberal"
is subject to.
pps--and pretending not to be a "liberal".
ppps--and proclaiming that anyone who doesn't profess the "liberal code of
honor" is a Nazi, as lojbab's "compatriots" have done.
More information about the Neur-sci