BLASPHEMY: brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
Gray Shockley
gray at compcomm.com
Thu Nov 14 13:48:36 EST 2002
"""""John Knight""""" wrote:
>>> According to the US Census Bureau in the last half a century
>>> http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/wp96file.html and
>>> http://christianparty.net/population.htm Botswana grew from 400 million
>>> to 1.5 billion,
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>> Look at those numbers again, please. Botswana is a near desert
>> country. It has less than 1.6 million people.
"""""John Knight""""" wrote:
> That was supposed to be 430,000 to 1.5 million (or 1,478,000 to be precise).
>
> This is the US Census Bureau figure. This is a 343.7% increase, which works
> out to an annual growth rate of 6.87% (which is quite a bit higher than your
> claim that it was less than 1%).
--------------------------------------------------------
6.87%!!!!!!???!!!
You are getting more and more demented as time goes on by!
6.87%!!!!!!???!!!
You really do write about things about which you not only know nothing but -
as was said about Jimmy Carter's foreign policy - you don't even know you
know nothing.
I'm not going to do the math but 6.87% would be an extraordinarily high
population.
The """John""" gimme another """Knight""" blurred:
>>> If you have a better source than the Census Bureau, why didn't you cite
> it?
Why does """"John Knight""" think the United States Census Bureau has to be
perfectly correct on a six-year-old projection? Does """John Knight""" really
think the United States sends census workers to Africa every ten years?
""""John Knight""" then staggered and slurred:
> Even if you were right (which you evidently aren't), the growth rate in the
> REST of Africa was so phenomenal that this minor, putative reduction in a
> "near desert country" was totally and completely drowned out.
>
> John Knight
Oh really? Do you think the rest of Africa had a higher annual growth rate
than your claim of 6.87% for Botswana? Or to quote you:
> This is the US Census Bureau figure. This is a 343.7% increase, which works
> out to an annual growth rate of 6.87% (which is quite a bit higher than your
> claim that it was less than 1%)."
Poor stupid, uneducated """""John Knight""""". The yankee boy just ain't
right bright.
Gray Shockley
--------------------------------------------------------
Is inbreeding as bad as """John Knight""" witnesses?
More information about the Neur-sci
mailing list