BLASPHEMY: brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Bob bobx23456 at
Thu Nov 14 16:17:48 EST 2002

Gray Shockley wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:10:26 -0600, John Knight wrote
> (in message <mVVz9.205$XF5.102570 at>):
>>Nuclear bombs are petty compared to the weapons of mass destruction used by
>>the US in JUST the last 6 decades.  According to Japanese sources, 9 million
>>Japs died in WWII, but only 1/90th as many died of nuclear bombs.
>>Firestorms in cities like Kyoto and Dresden and Hamburg, and the 2,000 pound
>>bombs dropped by the truckloads out of B-52s which killed 2 million
>>Vietnamese, qualify as weapons of mass destruction because they killed
>>thousands of times more people than nuclear bombs ever have.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> By your daffynition, then, handguns and longguns probably qualify.
> Heck! Booze probably qualifies as there are tens (hundreds?) of thousands (or 
> more) who have died as a result of drinking alcoholic beverages themselves or 
> being killed by those who have.
> I can see it now: Sadam and """""John Knight""""" urge you to join BADAWMD 
> (Boys Against Drinking Alcohol While Mass Destructing).
> Gray Shockley
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Everything is always the worst it's ever been.

By these daffynitions tobacco is the all time worst weapon of 
mass destruction.  The Native Americans who gave it to the 
English ought to have been shot. Or were they?


More information about the Neur-sci mailing list