Re. brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Tue Oct 1 12:07:20 EST 2002







Continued from "Nuremberg: The Crime That Will Not Die" :


That was the reality. Judge Jackson, handling the prosecution of Nuremberg's
most important trials was a man with presidential ambitions who needed a
high profile carved out of a self-serving stage: The Nuremberg Trials were
to be the launching pad of his presidential race. The Nuremberg court was
not selected from, or composed of, judges of the neutral Swiss, or the
neutral Swedes, or some more distant African, Asian or Latin American
countries. American civilian judges to a large extent made up the core of
the Allied judges--not military career officers, who might have had some
understanding and compassion for what the military leaders and the civilian
government under extreme war time conditions lived through. They could have
undoubtedly had a greater appreciation of why some of the wartime measures
were undertaken by Germany in the desperate days of the war. The "liberal
country club" experienced set of small town American judges could not.

Furthermore, the Allied victors blatantly carried on their war against the
Germans by other means long after the shooting had stopped--not by bombs and
bullets but this time by falsely diagnosing psychologists or, worse, by
giving torturers a free hand: cynical and brutal investigators who could,
and frequently did, mistreat, beat, whip, starve, suffocate and mutilate
their prisoners into giving confessions and statements which were as cruelly
extracted as were the confessions from witches during the disgusting
witchcraft trials of the Dark Ages.

The injustice of the Nuremberg Trials was testified to not only by Harlan
Fiske Stone, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, but
also Iowa Supreme Court Justice Charles F. Wennerstrum, a man of the
Midwest, who sat on one of the tribunals trying lesser alleged Nazi war
criminals after the war.

Wennerstrum pointed out in a celebrated and controversial interview given to
a reporter of the Chicago Daily Tribune that frequently the interrogators
and some of the prosecutors were Jews who had fled Nazi Germany and came
back in Allied uniforms to torment and seek revenge on the National
Socialists who had wanted to expel the Jews from European living space
because they considered them harmful to the war effort and to Western
European civilization.

Here is how the article described the lot that came to post-war Germany to
settle private scores, as seen through Justice Wennerstrum's eyes, after he
quit in disgust:

"If I had known seven months ago what I know today," (Wennerstrum) told
friends as he packed to leave for America, "I would never have come here. .
. The initial war crimes trial here was judged and prosecuted by Americans,
Russians, British and French with much of the time, effort and expenses
devoted to whitewashing the Allies and placing the sole blame for World War
II upon Germany.

"What I have said of the nationalist character of the tribunals," the judge
continued, "applies to the prosecution. The high ideals announced as the
motives for creating these tribunals has not been evident.

"The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from
vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions. It has failed
to strive to lay down precedents which might help the world to avoid future
wars.

The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome. Linguists were needed. the
Americans are notably poor linguists. Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and
researchers were employed who became Americans only in recent years, whose
backgrounds were embedded in Europe's hatreds and prejudices. . . (emphasis
added) (Chicago Daily Tribune, 23 February 1948)

In other words, the Allies supplied the interrogators, most of them Jews--as
some of the victims, who had had a lifetime of experience in dealing with
Jews and thus recognized them, have stated. Those of us who are German and
can speak German can easily discern the ethnicity of some of the accusers by
their mere accents and patterns of speech, even in radio broadcasts and
newsreels.

Most of the evidence in the trials was "documentary," selected by the Allies
from the large tonnage of captured records. The document selection was made
by the prosecution. The defense had access only to those documents which the
prosecution considered material to the case and were made available to the
defense. The Allies could choose to release or to hide and/or destroy any
documents which did not fit their post-war strategy or plans at Nuremberg.
The Allies admitted elsewhere that their propaganda Ministries and
Intelligence Services had previously forged Nazi stamps, Nazi passes, Nazi
passports, orders, ID cards etc. which fooled the Nazis many times because
they were so perfect and over which the Allied propagandists gloat to this
day. It does not take a great leap of the imagination to think what these
same Allied Government agencies, their personnel and forgers of documents
could do now with all the captured genuine German document-producing
facilities, the captured type writers, rubber stamps and tons of letter
heads of all sizes and description and of any National Socialist
organization you care to mention.

Even setting aside questionable "documentary" evidence, let's look at some
of the accused's "testimony"--how it was extracted, and what it really
means.

Like vile exclamation marks, at the heart of the Nuremberg Tribunal stand
certain words: "Genocide" "Gas chamber." "Six million." These words, and the
value judgment concepts they connote, were derived largely from the
admissions and affidavit of one man, Rudolf Hoess, the one-time war-time
Kommandant at Auschwitz.

Rudolf Hoess was the Allies' most important witness to the "Holocaust." His
affidavit and his testimony were quoted extensively both by the prosecution
and in the judgment of the IMT at Nuremberg, as well as by the press. It was
his testimony which laid the foundation and validated the claim of the ". .
. extermination of millions of people by gas at Auschwitz." Hoess's
"confession" is heavily relied upon by historians like Raul Hilberg and
others as a primary documentary source to this day.

It is true that Hoess witnessed at Nuremberg to horrendous "atrocities," and
he also confirmed the "truth" under oath of an affidavit which he agreed to
sign for the prosecution. In it, he confessed to having given orders for the
gassing of millions of victims. The affidavit, by the way, was in English, a
language he did not speak or understand, according to family members.

We now know from the book "Legions of Death" that Rudolf Hoess was beaten
almost to death by Jewish members of the British Field Police Force upon
capture and badly mistreated thereafter until he gave this very devastating
"testimony" and "affidavit" used by the Allies propagandists ever since. You
be the judge. Here is an excerpt from this book by Rupert Butler, published
by Hamlyn Paperbacks, page 235:

At 5 PM on 11 March 1946, Frau Hoess opened her front door to six
intelligence specialists in British uniform, most of them tall and menacing
and all of them practiced in the more sophisticated techniques of sustained
and merciless investigation.

No physical violence was used on the family: it was scarcely necessary. Wife
and children were separated and guarded. Clarke's tone was deliberately
low-key and conversational.

He began mildly: "I understand your husband came to see you as recently as
last night."

Frau Hoess merely replied: "I haven't seen him since he absconded months
ago"

Clarke tried once more, saying gently but with a tone of reproach: "You know
that isn't true." Then all at once his manner had changed and he was
shouting: "If you don't tell us, we'll turn you over to the Russians and
they'll put you before a firing squad. Your son will go to Siberia."

It proved more than enough. Eventually, a broken Frau Hoess betrayed the
whereabouts of the former Auschwitz Kommandant, the man who now called
himself Franz Lang. Suitable intimidation of the son and daughter produced
precisely identical information.

When they found Hoess, here is how the capture played out. Clarke, one of
the participants, recalls it vividly:

"He was lying on top of a three-tier bunker wearing a new pair of silk
pyjamas. We discovered later that he had lost the cyanide pill most of them
carried. Not that he would have had much chance to use it because we had
rammed a torch (flashlight) into his mouth."

Hoess screamed in terror at the mere sight of the British uniforms.

Clarke yelled: "What is your name?"

With each answer of "Franz Lang," Clarke's hand crashed into the face of the
prisoner. The fourth time that happened, Hoess broke and admitted who he
was.

The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of the Jewish sergeants in the
arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an order
signed by Hoess.

The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjama ripped from his body. He
was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to
Clarke the blows and screams were endless.

Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off, unless
you want to take back a corpse."

A blanket was thrown over Hoess and he was dragged to Clarke's car, where
the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whiskey down his throat. Then
Hoess tried to sleep.

Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
German: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine." . . .

The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow was
swirling still, but the blanket was torn from Hoess and he was made to walk
completely nude through the prison yard to his cell. It took three days to
get a coherent statement out of him.

This statement, tortured and terrorized out of him, was the one we are all
familiar with--the "proof" for the so-called "gassing of the Jews."

Historians today are finally admitting that Hoess is a totally unreliable
witness--and is it any wonder? He spoke of a concentration camp "Wolzek"
which does not even exist. He swore that 2,500,000 people were gassed and
burned at Auschwitz and a further half million died of disease, for a total
dead of three million. The Toronto Sun of July 18, 1990 claimed 1.5 million.
The Washington Post, on the same date, also mentioned 1.5 million. Quoted
from an article by Krzyszlov Leski, we have the following:

Poland has cut its estimate of the number of people killed by the Nazis in
the Auschwitz death camp from 4 million to just over 1 million.

The vast majority of the dead are now accepted to have been Jews, despite
claims by the former Polish communist government that as many Poles perished
in Hitler's largest concentration camp. . .

The new study could rekindle the controversy over the scale of Hitler's
final solution."

Shevach Weiss, a death camp survivor and Labor Party member of the Israeli
Parliament, expressed disbelief at the revised estimates, saying: "It sounds
shocking and strange." . . .

Shmuel Krakowsky, head of research at Israel's Yad Vashem memorial for
Jewish victims of the Holocaust, said the new Polish figures were correct.

"The 4 million figure was let slip by Capt. Rudolf Hoess, the death camp's
Nazi commander. Some have bought it, but it was exaggerated." . . .

But the Polish authorities said accurate estimates of the number killed
could only be made by studying German documents seized by the Soviet Union.
But Moscow has refused to return the archives.

A most convenient excuse! In 1989 I organized a write-in campaign to
persuade the then-Soviet Leader Gorbachev to release the Auschwitz Death
Registers captured in 1945 when the Red Army took over the Auschwitz
complex. A few months afterwards this actually happened. Gorbachev released
these all-important documents to the Red Cross, which showed in minute
detail why people had died in Auschwitz, the cause and time of death, their
birth, address etc.

74,000 names of people who had died were listed, of which only approximately
30,000 were Jews, along with an almost equal number of Poles and members of
other nationalities.

The incredibly shrinking Holocaust! The "millions" that we have heard about
for half a century and that we hear and read about still today all started
with the "testimony" beaten out of poor Hoess on that horrible night in
defeated Germany.

Historian Christopher Browning finally had to admit in a recent Vanity Fair
article that Hoess was an unreliable witness. Browning stated that

". . . Hoess was always a very weak and confused witness. The revisionists
use him all the time for this reason, in order to try and discredit the
memory of Auschwitz as a whole." (Holocaust Revisionism Source Book, 1994,
p. 1)

But does that invalidate the Revisionist claims or their strategy? Not at
all. On the contrary. After all, Hoess's testimony was used as the skeleton
on which the entire Holocaust myth about mass gassings was constructed in
the first place. Revisionists have concentrated on Hoess precisely because
he is probably the most important source for Holocaust historians'
conclusions on and exaggerations about the Holocaust. Raul Hilberg, who
wrote the "Bible" of the "Holocaust," The Destruction of the European Jews,
(Holmes & Meier, Revised Edition, 1985 ) relies on Hoess's testimony
heavily, and Hoess was the primary witness relied upon by the Nuremberg
Tribunal in their judgment regarding the "extermination of the Jews," even
though he told the court of having been savagely tortured.

What's more, Hoess's treatment by the Allies and the total unreliability of
his "evidence" are not unusual. We don't know how many of the accused at the
Nuremberg trials were badly mistreated, since references in the trial
transcripts to their mistreatment was expunged from the record. (Read this
again! Material damaging to the Allies was expunged from the Nuremberg trial
transcripts!)

An example is Streicher's testimony. Streicher was reported in the London
Times as having testified that he was tortured, whipped, spat on, and forced
to drink from a latrine. (Streicher Opens His Case, The Times, April 27,
1946). His testimony was later expunged from the record of the trial with
the active participation of the prosecution, the president of the Tribunal,
and even his own defense lawyer!

Other traces of the brutal treatment of the Nuremberg prisoners, however,
have survived. One of these witnesses was Gauleiter Sauckel's reference to
threats to his family, which did remain in the transcript. During his
testimony in May of 1946, Sauckel testified that he signed a document, even
though he did not know what was in that document, after his family of 10
children was threatened with deportation to Russia.

And finally, it must not be forgotten that t his is the only judicial
proceeding conducted in the name of civilized nations where there was no
appeal mechanism to a parallel or higher authority for a review of the
proceedings or any verdicts that this so-called international military
tribunal arrived at. Their judgments over the leadership of Europe's most
populous state, against whom they had just fought a murderous, near
genocidal war, were final and deadly.

Keep all that in mind as you read, watch and listen to all the emotional
hype in the mass media on television and radio of these days. And for what?

The Jewish leader Nahum Goldman spells it out for you in his astounding
book, The Jewish Paradox, Pages 123-125, admitting to the mother of all
frauds. In his own words, at the conclusion of the agreement Goldman
obtained from Dr. Adenauer, the German Quisling State's first
Allied-appointed chancellor,

". . . the Germans will have paid out a total of 80 billion. . . Without the
German reparations that started coming through during its first ten years as
a state, Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure: All the
trains in Israel are German, the ships are German, and the same goes for
electrical installations and a great deal of Israel's industry . . . and
that is setting aside the individual pensions paid to survivors. Israel
today receives hundreds of millions of dollars in German currency each year
. . . In some years the sums of money received by Israel from Germany has
been as much as double or treble the contribution made by collections from
international Jewry. Nowadays, there is no longer any opposition to the
principle. (emphasis added)

Not anywhere you look!

After the Nuremberg Trials and Proceedings are stripped of the hyperbole and
smoke screens which surrounds them, it can be put quite bluntly:

The Allies did it all. The Allies fought a war on foreign shores--in part to
establish the State of Israel. The Allies lent a willing hand to political
ambitions that grew out of the Zionist camp. By means of the Nuremberg
trials, the Allies helped the establishment and financing of Israel. So as
to secure Israel, the Allies and their personnel became accusers,
researchers, interrogators, prosecutors, judges and executioners--all in
one! The Allies supplied the "experts" who sifted through the German
documents, which were all totally in Allied control, highlighting
incriminating documents, discarding exonerating evidence. These
investigators were told only to "find" incriminating documents against the
hapless accused, as I was told by the American scholar Charles Weber, Ph.D.,
who had been one of these Allied researchers, and who testified at my own
trials. These researchers were told were told to ignore the documents that
might have spared the lives of the accused German leaders. When all was said
and done, there was not even an appeal.

U.S. Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, speaking of the American Chief
Prosecutor, Jackson, finally had this to say, as mentioned in the Viking
Press hard cover, cited before, p. 746 :

"Jackson is away conducting his high grade lynching party in Nuremberg," he
remarked. "I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the
pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law.

This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."

Some sanctimonious fraud!

Some record for the Allies to be "proud of"--to have helped manufacture such
a sick, perverted Marxist/Zionist inspired legal farce that would condemn to
death the leaders of the only military effort ever undertaken to stop the
"evil empire" from bringing to us all their "hate law" ideology.

Are now the chickens coming home to roost? That's how America and the "free
world" have showed their gratitude to the defenders of Europe and Western
Civilization: by hanging brave and honest men who tried so valiantly for so
long to stop the decadence and the hypocrisy of what we now call,
shuddering, ". . . the coming New World Order"!

I bow my head in reverence to those who were judicially murdered at
Nuremberg. They were the world's martyrs, not villains. Not one of them
would have been condemned to death in a fair trial. Not one! Let's not
forget they sacrificed an entire nation, and in the end themselves, to save
Western civilization. They were defeated by thugs in robes and gangsters in
uniform and by the conspiracies hatched by shysters from the ghettos and
shtetls of Eastern Europe.


 The concepts expressed in this document are protected by the basic human
right to freedom of speech, as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the
Constitution of the United States, reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court as
applying to the Internet content on June 26, 1997.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
E-Mail us! Ingrid Rimland: irimland at zundelsite.org .
Only in case you found grammar, spelling, layout or programming errors,
please contact our webmaster: webmaster at zundelsite.org
Subscribe to our world famous ZGrams

Contact the Zundelsite
3152 Parkway #13, PMB109,
Pigeon Forge, TN,
37863, USA.







More information about the Neur-sci mailing list