brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Sat Oct 12 01:51:07 EST 2002


White women married to niggers IS a crime in many countries to this very
day.  It was a crime in this Christian culture we are heirs to for 1,950 of
the last 2,000 years.

No matter what man's law might say today, it has been a violation of God's
Law since the beginning of the Israelite rate, and it's going to be a
violation of God's Law forever.  That can never change, unless you want to
start tearing half the pages out of the Holy Bible.

John Knight




"Richard August" <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
news:%rLp9.4464$Ye5.1286747 at nnrp1.ptd.net...
> Dear John,
>
> If interracial marriages were a crime now, which they are not, then I
would
> be working with two of the worst criminals in history - white women
married
> to black men.  One of these women even has several children by a black
man.
>
> Granted, these two white women aren't the brightest bulbs in the box, but
at
> least they are WORKING, and not on WELFARE.
>
> The fact is that interracial marriage is no longer a crime, and as long as
> the couples are on the same wavelength and don't beat or kill each other,
> let them have each other.  I choose to remain celibate for Godly,
Christian
> reasons - possibly Oblation/Novitiation to a Lutheran Benedictine
Monastery
> (we already discussed that).
>
> Neither you nor I can change the world, John, and we cannot let the world
> change us.  We can only let God and His Word change us, and forget about
the
> rest of the world.
>
> Meanwhile, we can pray that God changes US, and that the changes that God
> makes in US would make US worthy of His Kingdom, which is Holy and
Righteous
> and Eternal.
>
> May God help us to become real Christians with caring souls, instead of
> careless, hateful, and spiteful beings, as we are fast becoming,
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Richard C. August
>
>
> "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> news:vpXo9.125110$S32.8952206 at news2.west.cox.net...
> >
> >
> > Dear Mr. August,
> >
> > Niggers look like niggers, even if they have blonde hair, white skin, or
> > blue eyes, so they SHOULD be required to list themselves as niggers if
> they
> > are 1/16th nigger [presumably you meant 1/16th rather than 1/6th?].
> >
> > Furthermore, anyone with ANY nigger ancestry ought to be required by law
> to
> > list that ancestry.  It's a violation of God's Law to fail to keep the
> White
> > Christian Israelite Race pure.  To fail to inform a pure White Christian
> > Israelite that the person they might be marrying is a nigger SHOULD be a
> > crime.
> >
> > For thousands of years before the jews got into this country in record
> > numbers, this made common sense, to everyone, which is why the Holy
Bible,
> > the US Constitution, and all state laws made miscegenation with muds a
> > CRIME.
> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Richard August" <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
> > news:UmVo9.3836$Ye5.1153761 at nnrp1.ptd.net...
> > > John, some states (such as Louisiana) require that you list your race
as
> > > "Black" or "Negroid" if you are 1/6th black.  That means your skin
could
> > be
> > > white as driven snow, your eyes could be sky blue, and your hair as
> blonde
> > > as puffed rice cereal.  To that state, you are still "Black".  Just
> > thought
> > > I'd let you know that.  -- Richard C. August
> > >
> > >
> > > "John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote in message
> > > news:fWgm9.94163$S32.6254919 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Dan Holzman" <holzman at panix.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:anb2nl$s2g$1 at panix2.panix.com...
> > > > > In article <f17m9.5696$Fl4.506637 at news20.bellglobal.com>,
> > > > > Parse Tree <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >That's false.  Race is entirely biological.  Ethnicity is social,
> and
> > > the
> > > > > >meanings of the two have been blurred together due to ignorance.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would direct your attention to a book entitled _White By Law_,
> which
> > > > > you will find listed at the book retailer's web site of your
choice.
> > It
> > > > > tracks the development of race as a legal principle in American
> law --
> > > > > a crucial point because for quite some time only "White" people
> could
> > > > > immigrate.  Particularly amusing was how Syrians went back and
forth
> > > > > between being non-white and white over the course of 30 years.
> > > > >
> > > > > Race is not biological, despite all the pseudoscience that has
come
> up
> > > > > around it.  It's purely a social and legal definition, which is
why
> > > > > there exist fair-skinned, blonde-haired, blue-eyed women whose
> > > > > passports listed them as "Black" or "Octaroon."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The simple fact that you too think it's odd that "fair-skinned,
> > > > blonde-haired, blue-eyed women" would be listed as "'Black' or
> > 'Octaroon'"
> > > > is proof enough that you don't believe your own bs.
> > > >
> > > > By DEFINITION, race is also GENETIC!  You cannot excluded genetics
> just
> > > > because there are a few exceptions to the rule.  This would be like
> > saying
> > > > "all Americans are on death row" because 3,000 Americans are on
death
> > row.
> > > > Just because there might be 3,000 blonde bimbos listed as niggers
> > doesn't
> > > > eliminate the other 480 million members from the Caucasian Race.
> > > >
> > > > John Knight
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list