Re. brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Jd JDay123 at BellSouth.net
Wed Oct 16 10:22:44 EST 2002


Bob LeChevalier <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote: 

>"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>>> Now if you want us to believe that the difference between races is
>>> supernatural in nature, then indeed science has nothing to say.  But
>>> if there is a supposedly natural basis for race, then science should
>>> be able to detect it.  But of course it cannot.
>>
>>The Holy Bible IS "science", by every definition of the word, and it DOES
>>*scientifically* describe the differences between the races, in GREAT
>>detail.
>
>Learn how to use a dictionary.
>(You are wrong.)
>
>>It is an extreme minority "opinion" that science can't determine race.
>
>Probably 100% among the scientists.
>(You are wrong.)
>
>>Even
>>the STUPID jews in Israel use *science* to determine if jews are jewish
>>enough to qualify for the "law of return".
>
>You've said it a lot, but no one believes things that you say.
>(You are wrong.)
>
>>DNA studies PROVE that the
>>genetic differences between niggers and Asians are just about as big as the
>>genetic differences between niggers and apes.
>
>You've said it a lot, but no one believes things that you say.
>(You are wrong.)
>
>>> Science is quite relevant to race - it says that there are no races
>>> other than the human race.  And race would not be an issue at all, if
>>> racists like you did not make it an issue.  It certainly is not one of
>>> the most important issues of today.
>>
>>If it's not THE most important issue of the day, you jews and "liberals"
>>wouldn't go postal every time a "White Man" stood up for his RACE, would
>>you?
>
>You call this "going postal"???  I do this for FUN.  You are a JOKE!
>
>>You can't even WAIT to insult a WHITE MAN, can you?
>
>Just nutcases like you, who would be a nincompoop no matter what color
>you were painted.
>
>>You IDIOT "liberals"
>>and jews and feminazis have used every word and trick in the book to attempt
>>to CURTAIL this simple discussion about RACE, haven't you?
>
>Over a thousand posts in this thread and you think we are trying to
>"curtail" it?  It won't be curtailed, until the "cur" wanders off with
>its "tail" between its legs.  That's YOUR decision, buddy-boy!
>
>>> Where is science used to pass laws dealing with race in the following?
>>> That a law mentions "race" does not mean anything about how race is
>>> determined.  And as I've said, in practice, race is generally based on
>>> self-identification - you are whatever race you say you are.
>>
>>If a nigger has 1/16th nigger ancestry and says he's "White", he's a LIAR,
>>because the law will not permit him to simply claim that he's "White".
>
>The law permits him to say whatever the hell he wants.
>
>>Many state laws prohibit niggers with 1/64th nigger ancestry from simply
>>proclaiming that they're "White".
>
>Prove it.
>(You are wrong.)
>
>>BUT, more important than that, it's impossible in the age of the internet
>>for a nigger to hide his nigger ancestry from the public, which means that
>>he cannot continue to spread his miscegenation without lots of people being
>>aware of it.  And this gives White parents the opportunity to preserve their
>>White RACE.
>
>Except that you have no information about most of the hundred
>generations before you, any one of which could have involved a black
>person because nobody gave a damn more than a few hundred years ago.
>EVERYONE is a mongrel by default, and cannot prove otherwise.
>(You are wrong.)

If whites are not a superior race then why do negros keep getting
lighter and lighter as a result of cross-breeding?

Jd





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list