brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Thu Oct 24 18:46:03 EST 2002



Well said, Ed!

There are a few minor points that might need to be corrected.  You wrote:

> Clearly, physical characteristics get handed down.  Equally clearly, IQ
> gets handed down, as well, despite how politically incorrect it may be to
> recognize that there is about a 15-point gulf between jews and Caucasians,
> the same gap which exists between Caucasians and American blacks, by the
> way.


This may be the best and biggest LIE the jews have ever pulled off.  If you
ask a jew to produce such a test result, we GUARANTEE you that he cannot
produce the proof.  Not even the moron Einstein, who FLUNKED algebra, was
able to "invent" or "discover" or even "WRITE" his own research paper:  he
had to STEAL and PLAGIARIZE from White Christian European men who published
the ENTIRE work 1-2 decades earlier http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm

Once you realize how successful this jew LIE was, then you have to wonder
how jews managed to transition from "feeble minded ... morons", as our own
immigration service called them, to "intelligent" in only 80 years.  Quite a
remarkable "achievement", eh?

Not quite http://christianparty.net/race.htm

"Gould's most inflammatory allegation consists of blaming IQ testers for
magnifying the toll of those lost in the Holocaust (p. 263). Here he has
followed the lead of Leon Kamin's (1974) The Science and Politics of IQ. The
Kamin-Gould thesis is that early IQ testers claimed their research proved
that Jews as a group scored low on their tests and that this finding was
then conveniently used to support passage of the restrictive Immigration Act
of 1924 which then denied entry to hapless Jewish refugees in the 1930s.
Gould goes so far as to claim (1996, pp. 195-198; 255-258) that Henry H.
Goddard (in 1917) and Carl C. Brigham (in 1923) labeled four-fifths of
Jewish immigrants as "feeble-minded ... morons"".


Now things are starting to make sense, eh?  The MORONS in Israel who call
themselves "jews", who can't even get along with 12 year old neighborhood
boys in Palestine, scored 466 in TIMSS math, which is DEAD BRAIN territory,
2 points lower than American 12th grade girls, who scored lower on this test
than if they'd just GUESSED:

http://christianparty.net/israel.htm

http://christianparty.net/timssphysics.htm

As the final hurrah, it's notable that jew Jersey spends $11,000 per
"student" for "education", two to three times as much as many states who
consistently score MUCH higher than jew Jersey.  Where jew Jersey scores
dead last or at least in the lowest tenth percentile in most of these
national tests, states like Utah and North Dakota spend less than half as
much and score in the top 90th percentile.

aha.  It's not niggers.  There aren't even enough niggers in jew Jersey to
explain such MISERABLE test scores.

IT'S JEWS!!!

If you plug the 466 that jews in Israel got on TIMSS into the equation, you
have a COMPLETE explanation for jew Jersey's pitiful academic performance.

And as the final, final hurrah, you (fortunately) can't catch "semitism"
from jews even if you miscegenate with them (something people almost NEVER
do), because Christians ARE semites and jews AREN'T.

Sincerely,

John Knight

----- Original Message -----
From: "Edgar J. Steele" <steele at conspiracypenpal.com>
To: "Conspiracy Pen Pal" <steele at conspiracypenpal.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:27 PM
Subject: AntiSemitism is a Disease (You Catch It from Jews)


> AntiSemitism is a Disease
> (You Catch It from Jews)
>
> by Edgar J. Steele
>
> October 24, 2002
>
> "The jew cries out in pain, as he strikes you."
>      --- Polish proverb
>
> I didn't intend for this weekly effort to turn into an inquisition of
> things jewish, but it is difficult to change course once set.  Consider
> what it takes to bring an ocean-going liner around to a new heading and
you
> have some concept of my difficulty with jumping from topic to topic.
>
> The response to my last three essays has been overwhelming, to say the
> least -- both pro and con.  Much of the con has taken the form of
> attempting to shut me down, but they will get this pen away from me when
> they pry it from my cold, dead hands, rest assured.
>
> In particular, I want to address voting before the elections in two weeks.
> In case I don't get there, here is the punch line of what I want to say:
> Don't just not vote, as most Americans have (not) been doing, of late.
> Better by far to make a statement.
>
> Not voting just plays into their hands.  It is easy to make a statement,
> though:  Vote for anybody, just don't vote for anybody running under the
> label Democrat or Republican.  The sole exception is if you live in Texas
> and Ron Paul appears on your ballot.  If enough of us do this, we might
> actually make a difference (of course, that assumes that election results
> will be tallied and reported accurately, which is quite an assumption).
>
> But, it's something we can do while we wait for the right time to start
> shooting the bastards.
>
> ----
>
> I mentioned last week that Mark Wiles, the Nevada-based JDL thug who
> previously had threatened me and whose fellow travelers had threatened to
> kill my children, had popped up again with an acerbic email which amounted
> to yet another veiled threat.  When he thought it was just the two of us
> exchanging emails, he was menacing and contemptuous.
>
> When Wiles realized that I had circulated his missive, together with my
> response, rather extensively over the Internet, he  became meek and
> conciliatory, suggesting that he had become the "victim" of my harassment.
> The Poles were absolutely correct in identifying this rather typical
jewish
> behavior with their proverb, quoted above.
>
> Every time I say something by which jews are offended, they launch a new
> assault, thinking that will silence me.  Rarely does that tactic work with
> anybody; never will it work with me.  This is the typical jewish response
> and why they have been ejected from every country in which they have
> achieved supremacy, as they now have done in America.  They really don't
> seem to realize that they create the very thing they decry.
>
> Wiles, of course, accused me of being anti-semitic, the trump card
employed
> by jews everywhere.  He likened it to a disease.  My response:  "Yes, it
is
> a disease - you catch it from jews."  He hasn't responded since.
>
> You do catch it from jews, you know.
>
> Not too many years ago, I thought the same as most Americans - jews are
> just like the rest of us; they go to a different church, is all.  My
> experiences since have taught me otherwise.  My teachers:  jews.
>
> A fellow on this list, who happens to be a personal friend of mine, poses
> the following question:
> "Edgar, what is meant when one is called a "Jew?"  Where did the name
> derive from?  What does it mean when someone calling themselves a Jew says
> "they themselves, or....someone else, is a Jew? - (this one... how a "Jew"
> explains this, may be most important).  Do you know a Jew who would
> earnestly answer this question for us who wish to know?  Surprisingly, to
> this Christian. and many other Christians, there is much confusion over
> this word.  It seems there are a lot of different definitions and
> understandings of the word 'Jew.'"
>
>             - Jack
>
> An interesting question, and not one that I have encountered in quite this
> form before.  Striking in its simplicity and engaging for its
implications.
> So often we argue things, assuming that we agree on the fundamentals,
> thereby dooming ourselves to argue forever.  This, I think, is one of
those
> fundamentals about which we think we all agree, yet don't.
>
> Jack, I am flattered that you would think I have this answer. So many
> academics claim to have a lock on it, academics who have studied it far
> more than I, after all. On second thought, they are the last that I
> would want to consult. A plain-language, "real-world" definition is what I
> sense that you seek.  Let's see if I can do your question justice.
>
> Jew is a term that, like so many, has morphed in recent times.
>
> Traditionally, it refers to one persuaded of Judaism, but that is far from
> what we really mean today when we use the term. There really is nothing
> religious about it, though jews love to erect the religious defense when
it
> suits their purpose.
>
> Jews, generally, will say that it is a religious label.  Some will
> acknowledge the racial aspect.
>
> However, there should be no confusion between modern-day judaism and the
> Jews mentioned in the Bible. There simply is no connection that can be
> established between them. Many today consider Christians of one flavor or
> another to be the rightful heirs to the Biblical mantle of Jewishness.
They
> have as much claim to the title as any, I suppose. Many carry on this
> dialogue extensively, but none can prove their thesis definitively.  Bush
> and Ashcroft both claim to be Christians, for example, but a strong
> argument could be made that they are mere wolves in sheep's clothing, if
> not the embodiment of the AntiChrist, himself. A similar argument can be
> spun concerning those who call themselves jews today.
>
> I submit that it does not matter.
>
> What matters is what we mean by the word today, and what is meant by those
> who actively, with our assistance, call themselves "jews."
>
> Discarding the Biblical/Talmudic connection is necessary to properly
> evaluate what we mean by "jew" today, regardless of what a jew actually
may
> be.
>
> Jews simply cannot be defined in terms of modern religious terms.  Israel,
> for example, is predominantly atheistic, yet every citizen of that country
> considers him or herself to be jewish.
>
> A large part of defining anything is defining what it is not, and being
> jewish has nothing to do with religion.
>
> Many submit that it is largely a state of mind, a question of intent, if
> you will.  These people tend to be the ones who assiduously employ the
term
> "zionist."  Zionist is another of those terms.  I tend to see a zionist as
> being far more than simply one who advocates an independent Israel,
> however.  I equate zionism with jewish supremacists, those who believe
that
> jews are superior to the rest of us and deserve to be our masters.
>
> Those who assail zionists tend to give a pass to jews who declaim
> responsibility for what is being perpetrated in the Middle East.
> Generally, though, they refuse to see how thoroughly America has become
> zionized.  By their definition, one would have to throw all the American
> shabbas goy (those who do the jews' forbidden work on their Sabbath) into
> the class of zionists, by virtue of their intent, starting with George
> Bush.
>
> Bill Clinton also springs to mind, he who recently said he would defend
> Israel with a rifle and give up his life, needs be, in so doing.  Of
> course, Bill couldn't be bothered to do the same for America when his
> number came up during the Viet Nam era (neither could George Bush or John
> Ashcroft, for that matter).  Bill got his turn at the trough, as did Bush,
> by doing the bidding of his NWO handlers, who are overwhelmingly zionist
> jews.
>
> So, I have to decouple the term "zionist" from "jew," as well.  One does
> not become jew by intent, except in name only when one converts to
judaism.
> But, then, I have already said it's not a religious thing, anyway.  Sammy
> Davis, Jr., wasn't really jewish, no matter what he said or did.
>
> Doesn't leave much, once you eliminate religion and state of mind as being
> the defining characteristics of "jew," does it?  Well, in fact, it does.
> It leaves a great deal.  It leaves race.  Some would say that it's
strictly
> culture; i.e., habits and customs, but they are being disingenuous.
>
> I respond that race is culture gone to seed and reborn genetically.  Breed
> your weird housecat to the weird cat next door and you almost certainly
> will end up with a litter of weird kittens.  Behavior is merely one of
many
> things that differentiate one race from another.
>
> I happen to believe that creationism and evolutionary theory are not
> incompatible.  Once created, why couldn't species then evolve?  In fact,
> might not that be the intended scheme?  Believing in evolution does not
> mean you have to buy into the way it is taught, by the way.  I sincerely
> doubt that much about modern evolutionary thinking is accurate.
>
> Being jewish is a racial thing, pure and simple.  Some of us are born
> Asians, some are born Caucasians and some are born jewish, among other
> races extant.
>
> There are two primary types of jews recognized today:  Sephardic and
> Khazar.
>
> Sephardic jews make up about 10% of all jews and, oddly enough, are truly
> second-class citizens in jewish society.  They have the true semitic
> features, including olive skin, and ancestry.  Only the Sephardic jews
> originated in the Middle East.  Only the Sephardic jews have even a
> colorable claim to Israel.
>
> Khazaric jews are descended from eastern Europeans who converted en masse
> to Judaism several hundred years ago, by edict of their king.  There are
> differing accounts as to why.  Some say because the king favored the
> written form of the jewish language (few languages were written at the
time
> and he realized the time had come for his country to get with the times in
> this regard).  Others say it was political and dictated by the religions
of
> the surrounding countries.  Khazaric jews manifest the pronounced physical
> features generally attributed to jews:  short, squat, hook nose, generally
> unattractive, but highly intelligent and possessed of a very aggressive
> demeanor.
> A friend of mine, a true academic in every sense of the word, responds to
> Jack's question as follows:
>
> "Ben Freedman, a Jew who converted to Catholicism, commented extensively
on
> this topic. In his book, "Facts are Facts," he relates how, originally,
Jew
> meant a resident of Judea, a Roman province acquired by conquest of its
> former Greek masters. The population was ethnically mixed,  predominantly
> Greek speaking. The sons of Abraham residing there were of the Mosaic
> faith. Those of Greek ethnicity were probably adherents of the Greek
> religion.
>
> "There may have been extensive mixing of these religious traditions as
> would be expected in any area where two populations had been mixed for
> hundreds of years. There is historical evidence for an Essene Christian
> Faith which predates Christianity in the area, notably mixing Greek
> Dionysian rites with those of the Mosaic faith, including the belief in
> ritual crucifixion and resurrection as part of the coming of spring,
> coincidentally around Easter time.
>
> "The New Testament refers to Judeans in the original Greek, not "Jews."
> Mr. Freedman emphasizes that the word Jew does not appear in writing until
> the middle ages when it was used in old English to denote those people who
> we now recognize as "Jews," namely an organized crime syndicate, tied by
> blood and "religious" ritual having international reach.  The English, as
> well as other Europeans, apparently believed that these criminals had some
> tie to the people of Judea, perhaps because they said so.
>
> "This misconception is similar to the reference to "gypsies" which comes
> from the belief that gypsies came from Egypt.  In fact, they seem to have
> appeared out of northern India.
>
> "The best evidence is that greater than 90% of the self-styled "Jews" have
> no historical connection to the middle east but rather are a mongolian
> Turkic people called Khazars who converted to the monotheistic beliefs of
> Judaism in the 8th century when they resided in a kingdom known as
Khazaria
> where the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea. Subsequent to their
conversion,
> they adopted the name of the religion of Judea as part of their identity
> and called themselves "Jews."
>
> "Genetic studies have shown that these "Jews" are actually a separate
group
> and are recognized by Jews as such.  They are called Askenazim to
> differentiate themselves from those "Jews" of North African origin known
as
> "Sephardim" from the Hebrew word for Spain, as they entered Spain with the
> moorish invasion of the Iberian peninsula. Both groups are united in their
> hatred of Europeans and in their propensity to accumulate money at the
> expense of all else, often through criminal enterprise and other
activities
> at the fringe of moral society.  In this, they share certain traits with
> the gypsies."
>      -Al
>
> At minimum, it is clear that Khazar jews are the problem.  They like to
> pretend it's cultural, the differences between them and the rest of us.
It
> isn't.  It's inherited.  It's encoded in their DNA.  Maybe it was cultural
> at one time, but it has evolved into racial behavior today.  They are
> genetically predisposed to being aggressive, manipulative and predatory.
> It's racial.
>
> Clearly, physical characteristics get handed down.  Equally clearly, IQ
> gets handed down, as well, despite how politically incorrect it may be to
> recognize that there is about a 15-point gulf between jews and Caucasians,
> the same gap which exists between Caucasians and American blacks, by the
> way.
>
> Why is it so hard to believe that disposition and demeanor are also
> inherited?  Those with children are well aware of how we all come to life
> with baggage.  What is missed is just how extensive that baggage really
is.
>
> My wife and I breed and raise registered horses.  One of the defining
> characteristics of a desirable horse is demeanor and disposition.  It is
> clear to those in the business that these characteristics can be bred,
just
> as coloration, speed and size are bred.
>
> Human beings are no different.  It's the set of differences that
> distinguishes between the races.  It isn't just skin deep, but then you
> knew that, didn't you?
>
> And that business about jews having higher IQs?  It's true, of course.
> When you possess something in common with a group that clearly sets you
> apart from others and gives you definite advantages, then it is easy to
> consider yourself superior, generally, to others.  That is the trap into
> which jews have fallen and which provides their ultimate Achilles heel.
>
> Smarter?  In certain ways, to be sure.  Better?  No.  Don't forget that
> they have been ejected from country after country after country.  So what
> if they are in charge in America today?
>
> Shucks, boy, we ain't played cowboys and jews yet!
>
> -ed
>
> "I didn't say it would be easy.  I just said it would be the truth."
>             - Morpheus
>
> Copyright © Edgar J. Steele, 2002
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list