brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Thu Oct 24 18:51:49 EST 2002



"Jd" <JDay123 at BellSouth.net> wrote in message
news:3db864d0.5719717 at newsgroups.bellsouth.net...
> Gray Shockley <gray at compcomm.com> wrote:
>
> >Am I correct in believing that your "religion" consists of using the
parts of
> >the Bible that are "convenient" for you and re-inforce what you want to
do
> >and the "inconvenient" parts you ignore?
>
> No.  There are no inconvenient parts.
>
> All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for
> doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
> righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
> furnished unto all good works. (2Timothy 3:16-17)
>
> Don't forget Christians in Jesus are new creatures which are yet to
> be classified by science.  And it's been 2000 years now.  That's why
> some of these things may seem a bit odd to you i.e. the world at
> large is a bit slow in accepting new things.
>
> Jd
>
>
>
>

AND many, if not most of the "new" "discoveries" by "scientists" which
contradict the Holy Bible have been proven to be WRONG.

American "scientists" were just lucky that they found out that the world
isn't flat, because if many of them had to rely on what they believe the
Holy Bible says about it, they'd believe that the Holy Bible claims that the
world is flat.

It doesn't.

"Evolution" is a tiny example of how scientists discredited themselves,
rather than Christianity, by trying to prove that the Holy Bible's account
is wrong.  Less than 9% of Americans, but half of American "scientists",
accept the "theory of evolution" as is, and it's not the other 91% of
Americans who are the STUPID ones.

John Knight





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list