brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight jwknight at polbox.com
Mon Oct 28 22:02:27 EST 2002


"Gray Shockley" <gray at compcomm.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.B9DE32820007CB54130EB5E0 at news-east.giganews.com...
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:44:16 -0500, John Knight wrote
> (in message <kB%t9.17318$C53.689739 at news2.west.cox.net>):
>
> > "Jd" <JDay123 at BellSouth.net> wrote in message
> > news:3db8661a.6049968 at newsgroups.bellsouth.net...
> >> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> JDay123 at BellSouth.net (Jd) wrote:
> >>>> LOL!  I remember some of those wiccans quoting the bible too!  It's
> >>>> ridiculous.  The pagan thingy goes like this... " I don't believe in
> >>>> your God but this [insert a Christian quote] is what He told you to
> >>>> do".
> >>>
> >>> Has it never occurred to you that many of those who have chosen NOT to
> >>> follow the Book have studied it carefully before choosing something
> >>> else?  They also have to deal with people trying to convert them all
> >>> the time, so they get plenty of opportunities to learn the key
> >>> teachings of the Bible.
> >>
> >> No, it never occured to me.  I did not choose to "follow the book"
> >> or to even follow God.  God Himself chose me.  After that I figured
> >> it was a good idea to read His book.  Now if you're telling me you
> >> know folks who have the ability to actually choose God reguardless
> >> of what God Himself has decided, well, I think you've been misled by
> >> those folks.
> >>
> >> Jd
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > *Reading* the Holy Bible and *comprehending* it are two entirely
different,
> > unrelated, and sometimes contradictory phenomenon.  Most American 12th
grade
> > girls *read* math and physics books, but TIMSS proved behyond the shadow
of
> > all doubt that their *comprehension* of these subjects was ZERO, or LESS
> > than zero http://christianparty.net/timssphysics.htm
> >
> > Most of the 900 million niggers in Africa READ, or had read to them, the
> > Holy Bible, but do you think they understood even ONE word in it?  They
will
> > argue with you until the sun comes up that "thou shalt not steal" does
NOT
> > mean "thou shalt not steal".  If they don't get that one, you can bet
they
> > don't and can't get the rest.
>
> You mean they're like "deadbeat dads"?
>
>
>
> Gray Shockley

Here are a few facts from http://christianparty.net/mothers.htm  about
"deadbeat dads" for you to sink your teeth into, Shockley.  Compared to
fathers, mothers are:

59 times as likely to murder their children.
78% of the perpetrators of serious child abuse.
Half as likely to be employed.
Four times as likely to raise their children in poverty.
The source of only 10% of family incomes.
Three times as likely to kill their children in an auto accident.
Twice as likely to hire a killer to murder their spouse.
Five times as likely to be acquitted for the same crime.
16% less likely to be imprisoned if convicted of the same crime.
Twice as likely to kill their spouse with a knife.
One fifth as likely to be a murder or suicide victim.
42 times more dangerous to children than firearms.
Twice as likely to be absent from work.
One eleventh as likely to be killed in the work place.
One 14,000th as likely to be killed in battle.
Negative contributors to the federal tax base.
In possession of 3 1/2 billion fewer brain cells.
Undesirable as politicians.
Three fifths of the perpetrators of domestic violence.
100% responsible for the murder of 40 million American babies in the womb.
100% responsible for rearing 30 million children who weren't genetically
linked to their own husbands.
100% responsible for LIES which put 1 to 2 million innocent American men in
prison.
1/6th as likely as fathers to be ordered to pay "child support" and pay an
average of only two thirds of what fathers pay

Twice as likely as fathers to fail to pay anything at all and pay less than
4% of all child support payments due.

14 times as likely to receive AFDC.

More likely to receive food stamps, be separated or never married and have
10% more children per household than married families.

Women as a group receive $98 billion more back from the IRS in tax credits
than they pay in taxes and half of women-owned firms have annual receipts of
less than $10,000 with average receipts one fourth of men-owned firms,
making Small Business Administration loans another hidden source of welfare
for mothers.

Even after all these social transfer payments, four out of five mothers
receiving AFDC still live below the poverty level compared to only one out
of eight mothers who don't receive AFDC and female householders are still
five times more likely to live in poverty than married couples.

With SIDS [sudden infant death syndrome] now being exposed as a coverup for
mothers who murder their children, the rate at which they murder their
children may triple the above figures.

Can you even imagine where your life would be like if your country were run
by deadbeat moms?

John Knight






More information about the Neur-sci mailing list