brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
raugust at ptd.net
raugust at ptd.net
Wed Sep 4 07:56:23 EST 2002
Dear Mr. Holzman,
"I'm sure it's a trivial exercise for any female reader, or male reader who
filed a joint tax return, to review how much taxes they paid in 1988 based
on female income. I know I paid money based on what my ex-wife earned."
Tell me, please, Mr. Holzman, how does your foot taste? Can you lucidly
respond with a shoe upper between your jaws, or does trying to talk hurt
You know you paid money out to the US IRS based on what your ex-wife earned.
Hallelujah. Maybe we're getting somewhere with you, sir. You paid money to
the Fed based on what your EX-wife earned, which means you SPENT the money
you both could have SAVED - on HER and HER child!!!
You now not only have an ex-wife, you have an ex-bank account, an
ex-paycheck, and ex-children, thanks to the feminist laws in our society.
Boy, you get a big "Dewey for President" button for that one. How much more
are YOU going to have to LOSE before you see that feminist "family" law and
feminist "tax" law have made you an EX-MAN?
Richard C. August
"Dan Holzman" <holzman at panix.com> wrote in message
news:al3t3p$dr1$1 at panix2.panix.com...
> In article <eued9.44032$Ic7.3353880 at news2.west.cox.net>,
> John Knight <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
> >To be specific, total IRS tax revenues for 1998 were $952,887,000, but
> >$124,289,000 of it was "paid back" [even though they didn't "pay in" in
> >firsts place] to women through "tax credits" and the "earned income
> >leaving a net revenue of $828,597,000.
> John's handwaving relies on you buying into the assumption that all
> women receive the EIC. The truth is, you have to have children to
> even be eligible for it. I'm sure it's a trivial exercise for any
> female reader, or male reader who filed a joint tax return, to review
> how much taxes they paid in 1988 based on female income. I know I
> paid money based on what my ex-wife earned.
> >Most men understand precisely. Only jews don't.
> >Actually, NONE of the jews and feminazis do, and many of the normal women
> This must be what the voices tell you.
> >> 89% of those taking the poll at your web site? Was that you and 88%
> >> of the voices in your head, or you did you tabulate everyone
> >> responding to your poll as chosing the answer you wanted, as you did
> >> with the Manifesto itself?
> >That's out of almost 2,000 respondents so far (less the jews who tried to
> >spam the poll, that is).
> Let me guess -- if you thought someone was Jewish, you discounted
> their vote. Yeah, between that and the link between your page's visit
> counter and the tabulation, I see where you get your numbers.
More information about the Neur-sci