brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
jeffgeorge666 at DAMNSPAMmsn.com
Thu Sep 12 14:33:08 EST 2002
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:14:37 +0000 (UTC), cary at afone.as.arizona.edu
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
>Funny, how at this point you have to jump to another book (Ezra)
>to tell us what the point was, when it's really much simpler:
>We get twenty-six verses talking about nothing other than
>the story of David and Bathsheba and David's betrayal of Uriah,
>and then the story, and the chapter, ends with the utterly
>unambiguous 27th verse:
> And when the mourning was past, David sent and fetched
> her to his house, and she became his wife, and bare him
> a son. But the thing that David had done displeased the
>I imagine the writer would have been mightily surprised if you
>had told him his final sentence was referring to some other story
>entirely; and that he was just too stupid to realize it.
So why hasn't John Knight responded to this point? It's amusing to see
the whacko run and hide when he's been proven wrong.
Soy El Diablo Gringo Supremo (Loco)
Oi! Where's the fucking bar, John?
More information about the Neur-sci