I can't read the article because I don't have a Postscript
interpreter on my internet PC.
But there's no single 'time' scale within nervous systems.
All there is is the one energy 'scale' - through the 'lens' of its
formerly-accumulated "biological mass" [AoK, Ap5], nervous systems
literally weigh the experientially-relevant energy costs of this or
that that it is experiencing bia the activation that's occurring
I understand that the article might not address the subject
experience of that which has been referred to as 'time' - that it
might address the 'timing' that's inherent in synchronization amongst
neura; impulse 'events' - but it's all the same-stuff.
Degree of synchronization occurs as rigorous function of degree of TD
E/I-minimization, so all 'timing' within nervous systems reduces
directly to TD E/I-minimization, which is just the work that nervous
systems achieve with respect to 'climbing' the WDB2T energy-gradient.
My discussion of the so-called 'oscillation' artifacts of TD
E/I-minimization, from a couple of months back, is pertinent to this
'timing' discussion, as are all my discussions of the non-existence
of what's been referred to as 'time'.
If there's no such thing as 'time' within physical reality, and, as
I've discussed in former post, it stands verified that there isin't,
who can there be 'timing' :-]
What there is is degree of order within work performed by nervous
systems - which is just degree of useful work [non-'random' work] -
which is 'just' degrees to which nervous systems do, in fact, 'climb'
the WDB2T energy-gradient.
It's why information-content is 'encoded' as work - work =is= the
WCB2T 'maps' the information-content of physical reality.
Nervous systems do work which enables them to follow the WDB2T
'map' - which is Truth's one map within physical reality.
'timing' is 'superfluous' - what matters is degree of order within
the energydynamics inherent neural activation - which is 'just'
degree of useful work being performed by a nervous system in
question - which is 'just' WDB2T ^ -1.
K. P. Collins
"John H." <johnh at faraway.xxx> wrote in message
news:iXNka.123$cN3.4596 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
| At what time scale does the nervous system operate?
||| Enjoyed the above title, that's some temporal precision.
|| Thanks Didier
| "Lance Sherman" <lancesherman at insightBB.com> wrote in message
| news:PTBka.371204$L1.106250 at sccrnsc02...| > Didier
| > Thanks for your suggested reading
| > "Didier A. Depireux" <didier at rai.isr.umd.edu> wrote in message
| > news:b6sqfr$1sf$2 at grapevine.wam.umd.edu...| > > Neo <neo55592 at hotmail.com> wrote:
| > >
| > > > Also, in the cerebral cortex, how common is it for a neuron
in a chain
| > > > to loop back to the 2nd neuron prior to itself? Suppose N1 ->
N2 -> N3
| > > > -> N4. Does N3 commonly connect back to N1, does N4 commonly
| > > > back to N2, etc.
| > >
| > > I doubt anyone knows the answer to that question in any detail.
| > > projection, you have a back-projection. For instance, for
| > > areas, the number of fibers projecting from cortex back to
| > about
| > > 10 times the number of projections from thalamus to cortex (but
| > > projections back to thalamus are thin fibers).
| > > We are pretty sure you have a closed look if you include
| > > loops, but that's not part of neocortex.
| > >
| > > Look at the article
| > > "On the Dimensionality of Cortical Graphs "
| > > on
| > > http://www.dam.brown.edu/people/elie/publications.html| > > it's an interesting read that addresses your question in a
| > > sense.
| > >
| > > Didier
| > >
| > > --
| > > Didier A Depireux ddepi001 at umaryland.edudidier at isr.umd.edu
| > > 685 W.Baltimore Str
| > > Anatomy and Neurobiology Phone:
| > > University of
| > > Baltimore MD 21201 USA Fax: