I'll be gone in two days - if it matters.
"John H." <johnh at faraway.xxx> wrote in message
news:Yemma.16$v32.1574 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
|| "Dag Stenberg" <dag.stenberg at nospam.helsinki.fi.invalid> wrote in
| news:b75p9d$1ko$1 at oravannahka.helsinki.fi...| > KP-PC <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net%remove%> wrote:
| > > Naw - the Proof ain't heavy' - and it's been organized for
| > > all it requires is an academic Neuroscience group, somewhere,
| > > isn't 'afraid' to actually do Neuroscience.
| > Ken, I am sure most neuroscientists here agree that we need three
| > neuroscience groups: one for the health food freaks and alikes,
| > the accepted professional discussion of neuroscience methods,
| > knowledge, and one for your version of *academic* 'Neuroscience'
| > the =World=. This would facilitate the sorting of noise, but
| > we all also know that these categories would not stay apart.
| > Dag Stenberg
|| Dammit no category for me, so I'm starting my own neuro group:
Neuro Nuts on
| Acid. In about 6 months we'll have answers for all the great
| confronting Neuroscience, and will ride into town on our noisy
| with thrash music blaring out to announce are Messianic arrival.
|| You are correct Dag, I suggest a moderated group. This ng is shot
||| John H.