KP-PC <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net%remove%> wrote:
> I understand the 'economics' of publishing. But I also understand
> that there's earth-shaking stuff in AoK that's flat out easy to
> comprehend, and because it's so, it's easy for me to see that AoK's
> stuff is not being dealt with Forthrightly.
No. It may be easy for you, not for us others.
> To my knowledge, AoK has never been formally reviewed. When I sent it
> out to "Scientific American", and it was back in my hands in three
> days, that just 'broke' me with respect to seeking further
Scientific American is a quite atypical forum. I am not surprised.