Get it?
Nervous systems do 3-D energydynamics - not 1-D 'meter-readings'.
It's not 'hard'. It's just not what's taught in grad school, and,
therefore, relatively-'unfamiliar' [TD E/I(up)-inducing], so TD
E/I-minimization within your nervous systems 'wants' to 'move away
from' it.
'Struggle' with it.
It's the Future of Neuroscience.
Work to see the 3-D energydynamics in whatever it is that you're
considering in nervous systems. It's all 3-D energydynamics, all
occurring in accord with globally-integrated TD E/I-minimization, all
the way down to the 'level' of individual-ion directionalities, and
beyond, to their continuous Coulomb forces.
It's the 3-D energydynamics that 'address' [imbue directionality]
within molecular dynamics, which 'address' the DNA, which govern
protein synthesis, etc., and within all of this, everything occurs in
a way that's rigorously coupled to WDB2T ^ -1.
This rigorous coupling is how, and why, 'Knowing' is automated within
our nervous systems.
Honest, it's worth the effort.
ken [K. P. Collins]
--
"Schmitd! Schmitd! Ve vill build a Shapel!"
"KP-PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net%remove%> wrote in message
news:nzEra.57976$cO3.3924508 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| [...]
