Salaries of Scientists Drop

k p Collins kpaulc at [----------]earthlink.net
Sat Dec 20 01:20:02 EST 2003


"Noelie S. Alito" <noelie at deadspam.com> wrote in message
news:bs0cvp$86a3o$1 at ID-117948.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Dag Stenberg" <dag.stenberg at nospam.helsinki.fi.invalid> wrote in message
> news:brshok$b5e$1 at oravannahka.helsinki.fi...
> > In bionet.neuroscience dkomo <dkomo at concentric.net> wrote:
> > > jsp wrote:
> > >> During the past two years, the salaries of
> > >> most scientists have decreased significantly.
> > >> See
> > >> http://www.jupiterscientific.org/sciinfo/sciencesalaries.html
> >
> > We were never in it primarily for the salary anyway.
>
> Yeah, we know:  The big money is in reselling lab
> equipment and supplies.

The big-'profits' are in creating artificial stimulus-response
situations re. 'drug' use.

It's also an ab-use of everything that Neuroscience is.

The 'profit'-seekers 'just' hijack our Science.

It's been so curious to me that no one speaks-out
against such.

It's exactly analogous to any run-of-the-mill
organized crime, after all.

The 'silence' that's prevailed speaks volumes
with respect to the coercive dynamics that
are in-place.

All the more reason to stand-against-it.

ken




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list