I have a question
NzOaSrPeAlMlam at twcny.rr.com
Sat Feb 8 16:28:51 EST 2003
It seems you're referring to a visual sampling rate. There are certainly
psychophysical thresholds having to do with effective sampling rates, but I
know of no evidence that it's constant and applicable to all types of
stimuli - like how a tv or computer monitor works.
"jakob ashtar" <bamsefarogkyllingen at mailer.dk> wrote in message
news:3e42e735$0$2550$ba624c82 at nntp04.dk.telia.net...
> the frequency i am talking about is the frequency in time as
> in how many "images" the brain is able to process and interpret per
> the reason for my question is that if the human brain
> processes and interprets images perceived thru
> the human eye at a certain time-frequency, then
> the "reality" observed by this eye might look
> different if the brain operated at another frequency...
> if an object rotates around an observer at a certain frequency and this
> observer always looks in the
> same direction, then the observer will either see no object or he will see
> the object standing still in mid air...
> or am I wrong?
> the point im trying to make is that the "reality" we observe
> depends on the frequency at which our brain is able
> to process and interpret the input we get thru our
> this leads to the idea that the "reality" can have many
> forms and the one reality that we as humans see might
> be just one out of many realities...
> the observer
> "Dag Stenberg" <dag.stenberg at nospam.helsinki.fi.invalid> wrote in message
> news:b1unds$e1e$1 at oravannahka.helsinki.fi...
> > "smølf" <bamsefarogkyllingen at mailer.dk> wrote:
> > > Does the human brain interpret and process visual input
> > > at a certain frequency?
> > >
> > > How is this frequency measured?
> > "Frequency" can mean different things. There is frequency in time,
> > angular frequency etc. Please specify your question.
> > Dag Stenberg
More information about the Neur-sci