Science in the News

Kenneth 'pawl' Collins k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Tue Jan 7 12:13:43 EST 2003


"Oh, woe is me!" :-]

And I going to go right on being 'woed' until folks're 'desensitized' to all that's inherent in correcting old-long-since Errors, and getting on with what needs to be done.

So much wasted 'time' for no reason other than that folks're 'afraid' of being 'embarassed'.

So the garbage heap remains.

But, here I am - shovel in hand, determined to just remove it all.

It just 'hurts' some - like, Dag's post - what was that, Dag, the day before the Nobel nominations closed this year? One final 'test'?

I Failed... again :-]

"Oh well."

I doubt I'll be able to hold on beyond another 6 weeks, anyway.

Intend to do some stuff between now and then, though.

My jaw is just hanging down that folks're willing to go to war to slaughter their fellow Humans, but will not just communicate NDT's understanding... and, now, TH'll meet the same at the hands of the 'club'(?)

It's all so 'raunchy' from where I look on... I can see no one, in all of 'professional science' who isn't totally compromised.

And what's 'hilarious' is that everyone else pretty much follows the lead of 'professional science' - the 'blind' leading the 'blind'... "C;mon folks, let's see how well our weapons have improved in the last 11 years."

And they're going at slaughtering our fellow Human Beings as if it's all come circus side-show.

And then they 'wonder' why folks elsewhere do the same-stuff, in their own way?

They 'wonder' whece come the lessons of slaughtering fellow Humans?

And Neuroscience just looks on... hands folkded in it's lap like a good lackey who knows whence comes its funding.

Who cares about the slaughter? We need our grant money.

It's 'hilarious'... on =this= basis Humanity is supposed to find its way into its Future?

"Yeah, sure."

K. P. Collins

k. p. collins
    Kenneth 'pawl' Collins wrote in message ...
    This's more stuff that falls to me to do.
     
    'You' can't do it, because the 'club' to which you've given your fielty will 'ostracize' 'you' if you endeavor to challenge it, even to become everything good that it could be.
     
    You can't endure being 'ostracized'.
     
    So, it falls to me to do this stuff, on 'your' behalf - for it's a 'given' that 'the club' will not acknowledge my existence.
     
    It does 'amuse' me though to witness folks' 'scrambling' into action in the weeks subsequent to my 'hammering' folks with respect to their Responsibilities.
     
    I laugh as I 'weep' - seeing good things happening because of actions I've taken, but knowing that things'll only be Harder for myself... that I';; be even more 'alone' - for having done what needs to be done.
     
    Do 'you' see what's 'hilarious'?
     
    The 'system' has, built right into it, that which results in the system's defeating itself :-]
     
    But, my gosh, how it 'wrings its hands' over what to do about folks like me - and now nasty it can be when it thinks no one sees what it does.
     
    "Oh well."
     
    K. P. Collins
        Kenneth 'pawl' Collins wrote in message <6MBS9.31815$p_6.2679705 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
        "Fly Ball or Frisbee, Fielder and Dog Do the Same Physics", By YUDHIJIT BHATTACHARJEE
         
        http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/07/science/physical/07FRIS.html
         
        Quoting from the article:
        
        "Researchers say there is no clear evidence to show whether organisms have an instinct for the calculus involved in pursuing a target, or whether they learn it unconsciously, by trial and error."
         
        It's all just TD E/I-minimization.
        
        Quoting from the article:
         
        "Some believe that while the neural mechanisms used in computing an interception course are hard-wired in the brain, specific tasks must be learned."
        
        It's all just TD E/I-minimization.
        
        Quoting from the article:
         
        "Both dogs and humans seem to have the innate ability to track an object flying through three-dimensional space by using information in the two-dimensional image on their retina," Dr. Shaffer said. "Through experience, they learn to apply this instinct to catch a ball or a Frisbee."
         
        =Everything= that happens within the nervous system happens in 4-D, hich is just 3-D energy gradients' 3-D directionalities 'pointing' to each other. All nervous systems do is 'strive' to 'blindly' and automatically achieve TD E/I-minimization within this 4-space.
        
        Quoting from the article:
         
        "The ability to make smooth pursuit eye movements appears very rapidly over just a few weeks of development," Dr. von Hofsten said. "Such rapid emergence indicates that the ability for predictive tracking is a result of new connections being established in the cerebral cortex rather than something that the infant learns from experience."
         
        It's 'hilarious' - he thinks that, if the subjects were blind, they'd still be able to do it.
         
        What's my 'point'? 
         
        The fact that viable sensory reception is required discloses that even that which is considered to be 'instinctual' [in this visual-tracking problem] is actually subject to activation-dependent neural trophy - that is, it's subject to learning.
         
        Sometimes, my eyes just fill with tears when I witness the rampant stupidity that derives in the 'group-think' that's coersed upon grad students in Neuroscience.
         
        When will folks in Neuroscience call themselves to task in the realization that our Science is too important fore it to be relegated into the hands of a 'social club' mentality, in which any old hot-air 'argument' gains 'the nod'.
         
        Folks in Neuroscience must learn to think and argue, critically.
         
        And stop publishing the same errors over and over again at 5, 10, 20, etc. -year intervals.
         
        It's 'hilarious'. Folks in Neuroscience 'get together', and accept any ol' B.S. as long as it's embedded in the 'neuroscientifically'-correct social context.
         
        And what's really 'hilarious', all the Jackasses that agree to 'acquiesce' in this way, also 'conspire' to lock-out folks like me who will not forsake Science in order to gain admission to the 'club'.
         
        It's Pathetic.
         
        It makes me want to throw-up.
         
        People are Suffering and Dying all over the place; others to 'frustrated' that they've taken to 'terrorist' Murder, etc., etc., etc., and 'neuroscience' just ho-hums its Responsibilities with respect to all of this.
         
        Hell, 'neuroscience' is flat-out sticking its tail between its legs and running away from it's Responsibilities.
         
        Publishing the same ol' B.S. over and over again.
         
        "Ain't it grand?"
         
        Wake-up!!!
         
        K. P. Collins
         
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/bionet/mm/neur-sci/attachments/20030107/cee34f15/attachment.html


More information about the Neur-sci mailing list