Quantum effects in the brain
Kenneth 'pawl' Collins
k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Thu Jan 9 05:06:28 EST 2003
I do it when I realize, after posting the first thing, that there's
more that needs to be said with respect to what I'd posted - needed
Is there something 'wrong' with doing this?
I find it unacceptable to withhold info that I've realized is
pertinent, and, in the context of this or that that I've posted,
possibly not obvious.
Again, why not do so?
Mark Zarella wrote in message ...
|Why do you always respond to your own posts?
|"Kenneth 'pawl' Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
|news:jYYS9.101467$hK4.8231021 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
|> Kenneth 'pawl' Collins wrote in message ...
|> |Richard S. Norman wrote in message ...
|> ||On 7 Jan 2003 15:58:32 -0800, ukcomplaint at lycos.com
|> ||wrote: [...]
More information about the Neur-sci