Quantum effects in the brain

Franz Heymann Franz.Heymann at btopenworld.com
Fri Jan 10 18:05:22 EST 2003


"Kenneth 'pawl' Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message
news:CgoT9.103346$hK4.8395300 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Franz Heymann wrote in message ...
> |
> |"Kenneth 'pawl' Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
> |message
> |news:b2jT9.102982$hK4.8364149 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> |> Franz Heymann wrote in message ...
> |> |
> |> |"Kenneth 'pawl' Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
> |> |message
> |>
> |news:EQbT9.102548$hK4.8330868 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> |> |> Why not?
> |> |>
> |> |> |'...]
>
> |Since your posts contain no physics, perhaps you might consider
> |removing physics from your cross post list.
>
>
> That's, flat-out, a deliberate Lie.
>
> |You would then attract less fire fron physicists.
>
> I really don't care how much supposed 'ire of physicists' comes my
> way, as I shouldn't, it's increasingly seeming to me, in particular
> with respect to your replies, Franz. All you do is say "balls", and
> other stuff like that, over and over again :-]

I reserve my more intellectual contributions for folk in this ng with
whom it is possible to conduct a conversation at an intellectual
level.  You are not in that category, hence my standard replies of
"balls" and "horse manure".  You may guess from that that I do not
care much for pseuds.
>
> I gave you the benefit of the doubt because, earlier, I Erred with
> respect to your referring me to Klein-Nishina, if not re.
> Klein-Nishina itself.

That sentence is garbled.
>
> I'm just waiting to see if there's anyone in all of Physics who'll
> share their chaulkboard with an amateur who's held Physics in his
> 'heart' for 40+ years... if there's anyone in Physics who just does
> Physics, and not a prejudiced defense of what's become the status
> quo.

Franz Heymann





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list