David at longley.demon.co.uk
Fri Jun 27 07:13:09 EST 2003
In article <HbVKa.23830$3o3.1827747 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
KP_PC <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> writes
>You can't 'take that away' - it's the same-
>stuff as 'missing' a dear Freind after she
>leaves, and it permeates all aspects of
>nervous system function.
>'Take it away', and you're left with Junk.
>I don't care to discuss further.
>K. P. Collins
>"Schmitd! Schmitd! Ve vill build a Shapel!"
>"J Zijlstra" <jw53z at xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>news:775ofvc9ne3vgs1pdcsg1r03ae3ci1hifr at 4ax.com...
>| If I got some collours to look at for some time then after a while
>| will see some collours differently from there actual collour..
>| If we take that away which parts of our brains will suffer from it
>| J Zijlstra
That's rather unhelpful Ken.
Why don't you explain how TD E/I Minimization handles the oponent
process theory of colour vision?
More information about the Neur-sci