k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Fri Jun 27 14:26:17 EST 2003
"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Q1Lm$iAVTD$+Ewpo at longley.demon.co.uk...
| In article
<HbVKa.23830$3o3.1827747 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
| KP_PC <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> writes
| >You can't 'take that away' - it's the same-
| >stuff as 'missing' a dear Freind after she
| >leaves, and it permeates all aspects of
| >nervous system function.
| >'Take it away', and you're left with Junk.
| >I don't care to discuss further.
| >K. P. Collins
| >"Schmitd! Schmitd! Ve vill build a Shapel!"
| >"J Zijlstra" <jw53z at xs4all.nl> wrote in message
| >news:775ofvc9ne3vgs1pdcsg1r03ae3ci1hifr at 4ax.com...
| >| Hello,
| >| If I got some collours to look at for some time then after a
| >| will see some collours differently from there actual collour..
| >| If we take that away which parts of our brains will suffer from
| >| why?
| >| J Zijlstra
| That's rather unhelpful Ken.
| Why don't you explain how TD E/I Minimization handles the oponent
| process theory of colour vision?
| David Longley
I stand on what I've posted.
K. P. Collins
More information about the Neur-sci