BTW, =all= 'dis-ease' [as Peter calls it, and I agree, because the
hypenated-verbal-symbolism literally says it all :-] shares this
quality of being relatively-dis-ordered with relative to the 'normal'
degree of order within an organically-intact organism.
Because of this ruth, the first, and primary, question that those who
do battle with =all= dis-ease should ask is, "How can we eliminate
this 'abnormal' dis-order? [without, ourselves, imposing greater
dis-order upon the organism]?"
This's the one commonality of =all= dis-ease.
=All= dis-ease is 'just' departure from efficieny with respect to an
organism's 'climbing' of the energy-gradient that is WDB2T.
Folks who do battle with dis-ease should learn such, and focus
intently upon it. It literally 'points' right the 'directionality'
which =must= be in =all= Cures.
K. P. Collins
"Schmitd! Schmitd! Ve vill build a Shapel!"
"KP-PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net%remove%> wrote in message
news:Cctsa.62866$cO3.4198257 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| "James Michael Howard" <jmhoward at arkansas.net> wrote in message
| news:67j4bvg524dfv026a8291iod9ikd8vrtjs at 4ax.com...|| | It could simply mean that what we call opioids in vitro are part
| the cell
| | growth mechanism. So, one would expect to find these on cancer
|| Turn-about is fair-play, but that'd put them in all cells., which
| would've been fundamental knowledge by now, akin to, say, ion
| channels :-]
|| Would make for an 'interesting' buzz, though, but wouldn't be all
| that wonderful, because endoginous opiates can shut down
| function [which might be a synergy that cancer cells take advantage
| of(?) with respect to my hypothesized endogenous-opiate reaction to
| the relative disorder asserted by cancer cells - if so, perhaps
| 'tool' of cancer can be taken away from it(?)].
|| K. P. Collins