Reasoning v. other AI stuff

Eray Ozkural exa erayo at
Sat May 3 15:18:55 EST 2003

L.Fine at (Acme Debugging) wrote in message news:<35fae540.0305011251.188e4c3a at>...
> > So the answer to your
> >question must necessarily lie elsewhere....
> Don't understand this part. Could you repeat the question?

I think incorporating probabilities into a reasoner is not sufficient
by itself, but I don't know what the "ultimate reasoner" is :) It's
probably "common-sense reasoner"!

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list