L.Fine at lycos.co.uk (Acme Debugging) wrote in message news:<35fae540.0305032133.77308bf5 at posting.google.com>...
> I've avoided much investment in the first-step reasoner idea, and
> avoided specifics purposely to promote open-ended criticism. The
> multi-valued/ fuzzy /qualitative, etc. logics, and whatever my schemes
> are insufficient for, may yet have relevance to my narrow problem
> definition. Perhaps you would glance over my post just sent to George
> Dance if you have the time and inclination, as I would value your
I may have been confused over what the original question was, sorry.