I'm pleased to say in this case the words 'can be' applied, as myself and my
numerous test subjects are all still alive and well. infact, all very
relaxed at this very minute.
Tel: 01454 778609
- - Disclaimer - -
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage, disclosure,
copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail is prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by using the reply function and then permanently
delete what you have received.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE ORIGINAL E-MAIL WITH ALL REPLIES
"r norman" <rsnorman_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message
news:358acvgh1toukjb0djtqem622fk6vicaq1 at 4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 May 2003 00:58:28 +1000, "John H." <johnh at faraway.xxx>
>> >Thanks Didier, I'll archive this just in case I am struck down by the
> >prospect of a long painful death.
>> I wouldn't count on it being that simple. If it were, then execution
> by electrocution would not be such a gruesome practice.
>> It is true that it is current that kills, not voltage. So, depending
> on the impedance, even a low voltage can be lethal. However
> the operative words are "can be", not "is".