IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

'Entirety' - clarification

KP_PC k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Sun Nov 2 21:25:47 EST 2003


Further CLARIFICATION below.

"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:b3Cob.22930$Ec1.2027755 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| CLARIFICATION below.
|
| "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|
news:FRaob.199881$0v4.15566505 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | [...]
| | I've rewritten the underpinning Maths, in it's
| | =entirety=. No "eliptical functions" are
| | required :-]
| | [...]
|
| My statement, quoted above, is too-strong.
|
| I've just found a some other ways to
| calculate with respect to nonlinear sys-
| tems. [An example exists in the Proof
| of Fermat's Last Theorem I posted more
| than a decade ago - "Triangulation", and,
| of course, I use the V/Ar NL-P almost as
| a matter of course [it relies in spherical
| Geometry, so it might be a superset that
| includes eliptical functions - I've not ex-
| plored that possibility because I only do
| Maths to get from 'point A' to 'point B'
| during this or that analysis.
|
| I don't "rewrite" anything "in its entirety".

I have put virtually everything on new found-
ations, though, and, from there, it all needs
to be rewritten, and I've also shown folks
how to do the rewriting.

I don't know how far I could, by myself, actually
get-into rewriting it all - and it's obvious that I'll
never know. Can't rewite much when one is
struggling  to feed and shelter one's self.

It's 'hilarious' to me that I am 'punished', in
this way for having done the best stuff that
a man could do.

So 'interesting'.

So disclosing.

So informative.

So "Inverted".

I've Agonized all along about whether I should
address all of this directly.

Doing so, of course, 'puts folks on the defensive'.

But not doing so leaves Truth unaddressed - so,
in the 'absence'-of-Truth that that'd leave, how
could folks discern Truth?

How could folks even catch a glimpse of what
needs to be done?

And, besides, leaving Truth unaddressed constitutes
'moving away from' Truth - 'moving toward' 'absence'-
of Truth.

And that's the wellspring of Evil, isn't it?

Yup.

So, I've been 'limping'-along, trying to do just enough
to enable folks to get-it little-by-little.

Only problem with that has been that folks've been
taking-advantage of that to 'move away from' Truth.

I've watched all of this unfolding, and it's finally
become clear to me that folks're not benefitting
from the 'indirect' approach.

What to do?

First thing, I cannot co-operate in such.

Second thing is that I still have to Live in accord
with Truth.

Truth is, Free Will must be Guarded.

So, if folks 'choose' to 'move away from' Truth,
All I can do is let them, watching, more, as the
gulf between them and me grows.

It's the Chance that's been inherent, since the
beginning, in what fell to me to do - that folks'd
see-it, but be 'overwhelmed' at having seen-it,
the only 'result' being that I'd be left to Die, re-
viled.

"Oh well."

So 'interesting'.

So disclosing.

So informative.

So "Inverted".

It's why I'll be logging-off in about 12 days.

Can't co-operate in 'moving away from' Truth.

In staying online, that'd be what I'd be doing.

Nothing I can do can Free me from the Obligation
that fell to me.

I'll still have to work to find another way.

But, if folks want to 'move away from' Truth, all I
can do, in-Truth, is let them.

Free Will must be Guarded.

It's in Truth.

If Free Will is not Guarded, to the degree of that,
folks can no longer Choose, anyway - and things
spiral inwardly - like in Iraq.

Like in all War.

Like in all of "man's inhumanity to man".

Since the Beginning.

"Can you drink this cup?"

I can, Lord.

Help me.

Love, ken

| Just develop Sufficient means to get from
| 'point A' to 'point B', and have a g'zillion
| techniques that I use in  doing so. I always
| solve the problem in the ol' noggin' lab,
| then, if doing so has Worth, 'encapsulate'
| the solution in a little QBasic app, so that
| others can consider the gist of it.
|
| Sometines, there's a lot included between
| 'point A' and 'point B', and the apps I post
| don't explicitly convey all that's actually in-
| there. The apps 'get-bigger' comensurate
| with one's experience with respect to the
| "lot" - that is, they apply to everything that's
| in-there, but such cannot be discerned
| unless one is experienced with respect to
| what's in-there.
|
| Anyway, that's what I meant by "entirety",
| realizing shortly after posting the prior msg
| that, because the connotation of "entirety"
| is dependent upon experience, folks probably
| won't get it.
|
| Hence this clarification.
|
| [Hey, I understand what I'm saying :-]
|
| ken [k. p. collins]
|
|





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net