Food for Ken
David at longley.demon.co.uk
Sat Nov 8 21:09:32 EST 2003
In article <c2a5221552d8f24e9d99fffa7fd4788a at news.teranews.com>,
OmegaZero2003 <OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com> writes
>"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:dFbYwdAH0Vr$EwPK at longley.demon.co.uk...
>> In article <df8fcd2f09fdf1367660391ba2d00a3e at news.teranews.com>,
>> OmegaZero2003 <OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com> writes
>> >"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> >news:x+Tj+$HlgPr$Ewpi at longley.demon.co.uk...
>> >> The problem is that there's as much nonsense in neuroscience as there
>> >> in other integrated disciplines,
>> >Oh really - please do tell! I am sure my cohorts at the Sante Fe Inst.
>> >Cal Tech will be amused.
>> What? You mean you and your "cohorts" are so naive that you believe that
>> isn't true?
>Are you so naive that you do not understand how science progresses? How it
>is carried out Narcissus?
I've spent nearly 30 years in science in one form or another - so yes I
The more relevant point was - "Does Ken"?
Or doesn't *that* matter you self-centred idiot.
More information about the Neur-sci
Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net