Food for Ken

OmegaZero2003 OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 8 23:55:07 EST 2003


"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:+7twfcFcHar$EwZ9 at longley.demon.co.uk...
> In article <c2a5221552d8f24e9d99fffa7fd4788a at news.teranews.com>,
> OmegaZero2003 <OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com> writes
> >
> >"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:dFbYwdAH0Vr$EwPK at longley.demon.co.uk...
> >> In article <df8fcd2f09fdf1367660391ba2d00a3e at news.teranews.com>,
> >> OmegaZero2003 <OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com> writes
> >> >
> >> >"David Longley" <David at longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >> >news:x+Tj+$HlgPr$Ewpi at longley.demon.co.uk...
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> The problem is that there's as much nonsense in neuroscience as
there
> >is
> >> >> in other integrated disciplines,
> >> >
> >> >Oh really - please do tell!  I am sure my cohorts at the Sante Fe
Inst.
> >and
> >> >Cal Tech will be amused.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> What? You mean you and your "cohorts" are so naive that you believe
that
> >> isn't true?
> >
> >Are you so naive that you do not understand how science progresses?  How
it
> >is carried out Narcissus?
> >
> >>
> I've spent nearly 30 years in science in one form or another - so yes I
> do.

Psychologist hardly qualifies.

>
> The more relevant point was - "Does Ken"?
>
> Or doesn't *that* matter you self-centred idiot.

You are the master of self-centered-ness Narcissus!

Besides being a moron that is.


>
>
> -- 
> David Longley





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list