In article <2eb015dc16eddf45f8ebdbfeaf1b33e4 at news.teranews.com>,
"OmegaZero2003" <OmegaZero2003 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yet you "help" by telling people that they do not know what they are talking
> about, that thousands of neuroscientists are confused and idots, that people
> here should just read what you say and dismiss all other POV's because they
> are incorrect. Etc,.
If you want to read this into the practical, compassionate and helpful
advice that David offered Ken, you're viewing the world through a
distorting prism of truly monstrous powers. Saying that there is
nonsense in the field of neuroscience is like saying that gemstones have
flaws - it doesn't devalue the whole, as you seem to insist on taking it
I am impressed by the bravado you show while posting from an anonymous
identity - nice one. Grow up a little and do yourself a favour.