r norman wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:16:11 GMT, "KP_PC"
> <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>>>Hi Dr. Norman,
>>>>I agree with your comments, and have
>>reiteratively discussed why it's so [in my
>>discussions of 'implant' stuff, for instance].
>>Nervous systems are tightly-globally-integrated
>>information-processing systems, so any
>>external 'manipulation' alters the stuff that
>>it would 'manipulate', rendering the intended
>>'goals' of such 'manipulation' always-beyond-
>>>>Truth is 'somewhere in the middle', though.
>>>> <snip some interesting commentary and personal observations>
>> I certainly agree that the US Govenment has been and continues to be
> guilty of all sorts of awful things. It is just that this mind
> control is not one of them!
>> People misunderstand press releases and glowing predictions made by
> people who stand to get a lot of money doing all sorts of strange
> research from actual hard research results.
Mind control has a long and sick history, and is REAL. Those
who are actually interested in the truth can visit my web pages
Maybe you'll invite Ken to come and talk to you about his theories
now that he has brown-nosed you and you him. You know that he
worked out all of neurobiology decades ago.
Mind Control: TT&P ==> http://www.datafilter.com/mc
Home page: http://www.datafilter.com/alb