Whoops! Got the 1-bit-'error'-short-shrifting
Depending on SSW<->UES-harmonics-
phase conditions, there =can be= an Ob-
servable =decrease= in 'stability' - decay
'event' volume will =increase=.
So I've got to qualify my "'always'" as I used
it in what's quoted below.
Overall, the plot will reflect the NL-P as I've
The SSW<->UES energy-'containment' UES
'pressure' is also calculable via this approach
[one of a g'zillion ways that it is].
ken [k. p. collins]
"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:K4nfb.168264$3o3.12216863 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| BTW, this stuff has been in TH for at least 25 years.
| I've discussed it repeatedly here in b.n and in other
| online 'places'.
|| It's the way TH handles what's been referred to
| as "radioactive decay" - Deterministically.
|| I've added an important thing to the discussion
|| "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:RNmfb.168255$3o3.12214120 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
|news:XKrcb.152072$0v4.11317282 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | [...]
| | | "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| | |
|news:3xrcb.152062$0v4.11315265 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| | | | [...]
| | "`Other Dimensions? She's in Pursuit'
| | By DENNIS OVERBYE
| | Published: September 30, 2003"
| | http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/30/science/30MARI.html| |
| | It's not necessary to invoke dimensions greater
| | than three.
| | It's in Tapered Harmony that, if it looks like a
| | quantity of energy is 'going away', it's be-cause
| | that energy is just 'winking-out' of =observability=
| | as its ephemerance [freedom to move] increases
| | beyond a threshold, and the energy 'just' returns to
| | the UES.
| | This's all Testable.
| | Iff physical reality is as above, an Observable increase
| | in the quantity of applied energy that's required to
| | produce the 'usual' 'particle'-collision dynamics will
| | occur.
| | This's be-cause, when energy returns to the UES,
| | the UES 'pressure' local to that 'event' augments,
| | which 'bolsters' all local SSW<->UES harmonics'
| | energy-'containment' dynamics.
| | I'll be surprised if all the data necessary to Verify
| | this position has not already been collected at
| | Fermilab and.or CERN.
| | The only 'difficulty' is that a continuous stream of data
| | is Necessary. You can't 'pick-and-choose' as the folks
| | at Fermilab are doing - or you'll miss the thing that
| | you want to observe - the 'instantaneous'-but-exceed-
| | ingly-fleeting augmentation of collision stability [which
| | will be Observable as an 'instantaneous' event-decrease.
| | Get it?
| | The dynamics are roughly-analogous to what happens
| | when one gets into one's car on a cold morning, drives
| | off without allowing the engine to warm-up, and stomps
| | the accelerator - the fuel-air mixture often becomes too-
| | rich, and the engine loses power briefly.
| | The diminution of detector events is analogous to this
| | be-cause the local UES is 'too-rich' :-]
| | Should be 'easy' to see in already-recorded data [unless
| | the continuous stream has been tossed-out - no problem -
| | record a continuous stream]. All that's required is to crunch
| | the data looking for fluctuations in the decay-product
| | 'volume'.
|| "fluctuations" isn't the right term.
|| The Observables will be 'instantaneously'-augmented
| stability that's 'time'-correlated to energy going back to
| the UES.
|| Given such 'missing energy', plot it the way you please,
| the 'fluctuations' in decay-product volume will 'always' plot
| on your 3-D coordinates in the 'direction' of fleetingly-
| increased-'stability'. kpc
|| | ken [K. P. Collins]