One of the things folks should be
able to See in this spherical-Geometry
app is How and Why the NL-P variation
of the volume/surface-area ratio inherent
in the SSW<->UES harmonics always
undergoes energy emission and ab-
sorption via rigorously-stereotypical
This's =all= built-right-into the NL-P
behavior of the spherical harmonics.
There's a volume of energy 'trapped'
in the SSW<->UES harmonic.
Rigorous variation in the 'trapping'
volume Rigorously forces emission
or absorption of quantities of energy
that are =specific= with respect to the
'instantaneous' SSW's nonlinear 'com-
pression' and 'expansion'.
It's these stereotypically-occurring
quantities of energy that modern-tra-
ditional Physics has mis-interpreted
as constituting 'discrete particles',
when all they are is the nonlinear
variation of the spherical V/Ar ratio
in interaction with the surrounding
This's is =all= Testable via accel-
erator trials in which the spherical
Geometry is 'attacked' asymmetric-
ally. [Which, of course, will require
modifications to existing accelerat-
ors - in order to allow the setting of
the 'attacking'-asymmetry at-will.]
If such asymmetrical-'attacking' of
the spherical Geometry of the
SSW<->UES harmonics is under-
taken, it will be found that there are
as many so-called 'particles' as there
are ways to adjust the 'attacking'
asymmetry - which is infinite.
A =Complete= Proof of Tapered
Harmony's position exists in the fact
that one cannot assert that there
are an infinite number of "discrete
particles" in an 'atom'. So, since
one can produce [as above] an
infinite number of what have been
referred to as "discrete particles",
there cannot exist any "discrete
particles" within an 'atom'.
The =only= thing that can Exist
in-there is infinitely-divisible energy
that undergoes =continuous=
Deterministically, in Rigorous-
accord with the nonlinearity in-
herent in the spherical V/Ar
ratio's behavior under 'compres-
sion' and 'expansion'.
Hitting the SSW<->UES harmonics
assymmetrically =just= interacts
with their Rigorously-nonlinearly-
tially, in a way that's Deterministically-
coupled to the 'attacking' asymmetry.
[=Of course= the SSW<->UES
harmonics' spherical Geometry does
not remain "spherical" under asymmetric
'attack'. This's a wellspring of the In-
finity that TH predicts under the cond-
itions of this proposed Test.]
See the Infinity [or at least as much of
it as 'you' need to See to satisfy exper-
Then, See Tapered Harmony's
Reification of physical reality.
ken [K. P. Collins]
"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:tHShb.172216$0v4.13172290 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| ' sphyx01.bas -- an exploration in spherical geometry 7:25am, Sat,