charlie_wilkes at easynews.com
Sun Sep 7 16:37:28 EST 2003
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 08:50:04 -0400, r norman <rsn_ at _comcast.net>
>There is good science to indicate rather convincingly that this device
>cannot do what is claimed
I recall that 25 years ago, "good science" predicted that
electromagnetic fields, from broadcast towers and radios, could not
possibly disrupt cellular metabolism for the same reason Amy Dahl
claims the DDR cannot possibly work -- not enough transmitted energy.
But where is the consensus now???
More information about the Neur-sci