Report of Ecstasy Drug's Great Risks Is Retracted

rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski rfgdxm at
Mon Sep 8 04:47:03 EST 2003

Jasbird wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:18 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
> <rfgdxm at> wrote:

>>   If so, then why would the authors publicly admit they screwed up
>> and gave the monkeys meth instead of MDMA? It looks like an honest
>> mistake.
> How do you make that kind of mistake?  These are controlled substances
> and are, presumably, kept in locked cabinets or safes.
> The only way such a mistake could have occurred is by a) sabotage, b)
> fraud or c) an irresponsible disregard for the truth. I don't see how
> honest mistakes come into - only dishonest ones.

   Both would have been locked in the same safe. Someone grabbed the
wrong container.
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list