Report of Ecstasy Drug's Great Risks Is Retracted
host1buddha at postmaster.co.uk
Tue Sep 9 17:34:05 EST 2003
"Jasbird" <Jasbirdfirstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
news:8m1plvofbk7ghu7jutket4lcrdan4955te at 4ax.com
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:47:03 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
> <rfgdxm at vivisectSPAMMERSmochamail.com> wrote:
>> Jasbird wrote:
>>> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:18 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
>>> <rfgdxm at vivisectSPAMMERSmochamail.com> wrote:
>>>> If so, then why would the authors publicly admit they screwed up
>>>> and gave the monkeys meth instead of MDMA? It looks like an honest
>>> How do you make that kind of mistake? These are controlled
>>> substances and are, presumably, kept in locked cabinets or safes.
>>> The only way such a mistake could have occurred is by a) sabotage,
>>> b) fraud or c) an irresponsible disregard for the truth. I don't
>>> see how honest mistakes come into - only dishonest ones.
>> Both would have been locked in the same safe. Someone grabbed the
>> wrong container.
> Don't joke.
> If there are two containers in the safe - you look at the labels
> before grabbing them. Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (Ecstasy) and
> methamphetamine are two completely different names which people with
> masters and doctorates ought to be able to distinguish between.
>> "We're not chemists. We get hundreds of chemicals here. It's not
>> customary to check them."
> This implies that the two compounds were in mis-labelled bottles. Or,
> at least, that's his excuse.
LIAR! I hope you get sued for libel.
More information about the Neur-sci