"Fractallike"  CLARIFICATION [WASRe: High Resolution Intracellular Recordings?]
KP_PC
k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net
Wed Sep 10 19:56:12 EST 2003
"KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:ayH7b.136284$3o3.9689257 at bgtnsc05news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
 "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
 news:XLF7b.136177$3o3.9680238 at bgtnsc05news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
  "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
 
news:Wxk7b.132128$0v4.9665867 at bgtnsc04news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
   [...]
  
   
   "Schmitd! Schmitd! Ve vill build a Shapel!"
  
   "KP_PC" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
  
 news:sxZ6b.133485$3o3.9448048 at bgtnsc05news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
    "yan king yin" <y.k.y at lycos.com> wrote in message
    news:72de81ae.0309031548.39b66b2d at posting.google.com...
     [...]
    [...]
   What's incorporated in NDT is as it's briefly
   discussed in AoK, Ap6: "Information Calculus",
   which exhibits analogous infinite 'depth', but
   does so while both maintaining information
   content addressing and direct incorporation
   of the neural Topology.
   [...]
 
  Again, informationcontent addressing is
  automatically maintained via the rigorous
  mapping of "the special topological
  homeomorphism of [...] nervous systems"
  [AoK, "Short Paper", and the rest] with
  respect to externalexperiential energy
  dynamics.

 In other words, the "special topological
 homeomorphism" is a Fundamental
 mathematical entity.

 From the perspective of what's 'familiar'
 to me, it's =the= Fundamental Mathematical
 entity  the 'lens' through which all Maths is
 seen and done, through which Maths is
 Possible  viewing Maths as 'information
 content addressing'.

 Maths as it's existed comprises selective
 alternative 'special topological homeo
 morphisms' that map highlyselective
 energyflow considerations  the infinite
 ways of doing the one thing that the
 special topological homeomorphism
 of nervous systems does automatically.
That is, Maths as it's existed is comprised
of alternative =partial= 'special topological
homeomorphisms'  compound 'special
topological homeomorphisms, by virtue of
the fact that it's constructed upon [within]
the special topological homeomorphism
of nervous systems.
Typically, these partial [compound] things
are inefficient. an obvious example being
the Maths of Ptolemaic Astronomy, with
its 'epicycles'.
"No problem."
Just achieve further TD E/Iminimization
[Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Newton,
Einstein] and the Maths will converge.
A basic Problem with respect to such
Maths convergence, though, has been
nervous systems' tendency toward
'choosing' to 'move away from' "rendering
useless" [AoK, Ap8] rather than 'moving
toward' further convergence  so, folks
'stop looking' ["passive>active", "informa
tiongathering>performanceoptimization",
"development vs. use", "phase shift", AoK,
Ap7]. You know, this of that becomes generally
'familiar' [groupwise TD E/Iminimized], and
folks use it instead of seeking something
further and better  so progress stagnates
as the longfamiliar stuff is invoked. This
has nothing to do with the Maths that's
invoked, and everything to do with the
underpinning neural dynamics which op
erate in the absence of the stuff that's
reified in NDT.
Innately, nervous systems do Maths
creatively [literally]. It's learned 'social
sanction' that 'turnsof' such creatitivity, and
further Maths convergence  until the bruden
of evidence accumulates to the degree that
the balance swings back with respect to
the need to develop a better way. It's a
periodicallyconverging, experientiallyde
fined 'equilibrium'.
Most of why NDT's position is 'difficult' is
because NDT replaces all of the 'blind'
automation that's traditionally heldsway,
even within Maths, enabling direct mapping
[and seeing] of the energyflow that's 'normally'
mapped in roundabout ways [smiling as I
write this because I understand that it's still
the case that most folks see NDT's position
as "the roundabout way" :]
Anyway, I just wanted to clarify my prior state
ment with respect to the alternative [partial,
compound] 'special topological homeomorph
isms of traditional Maths.
ken [k. p. collins]
 This stuff is what I was referring to in AoK,
 Ap6, when I stated that ~"all other Mathematics
 can be done via Information Calculus".

 Anyway, the special topological homeomorphism
 is a Fundamental Maths entity  like a triangle,
 circle, square, etc., only moreFundamental.

 It's Topology maps all Possible Maths [all
 Maths that can be done by Humans  which
 is superficially no 'bigdeal' because it's
 equivalent to saying, "Nervous systems do
 Maths." To which one might respons, "Duh?"

 The BigDeal is that the special topological
 homeomorphism rigorouslymaps how and
 why nervous systems do Maths. It's that
 Fundamental a Maths entity.].

 k. p. collins ['Cringing' as I'm about to post this because
 I understand that it's one of those things that
 'invite castigation'.

 I mean no offense.

 I mean 'just'theopposite stuff.]

  [...]



More information about the Neursci
mailing list