"kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:Ntzrd.81090$7i4.19661 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| "AngleWyrm" <no_spam_anglewyrm at hotmail.com> wrote in message
| news:f%xrd.429771$wV.213471 at attbi_s54...|| In the visual system, neurons are
|| connected through several stages
|| in a directed manner from eye to
|| back of brain.
|||| Is this true of most all brain cells?
|| Do they have a directed nature? And
|| if so, where can I get a map of the
|| FROM->TO sections of the brain?
|| Such "maps" are given in any good
| Neuroanatomy text. The wholes of
| such texts are, literally, such "maps".
|| My favorite is =Human Neuroanatomy=,
| by Carpenter and Sutin [before that by
| Truex and Carpenter]. I checked for it
| on amazon.com a while back, though,
| and could only find some used copies.
|| [Anyone else know the Publication-state
| of this text?]
|| To come up to speed in working with
| the "maps" given in such texts requires
| some devoted-study.
It's as Drs. Norman and Kirkcaldie
In the view I hold, though, there's
a single "rule" that I've never seen
violated, from gross Neuroanatomy
to sub-ionic dynamics.
Everything in a 'normal', orgaincally-
intact nervous system is mapped as
a single "multi-Mobius-ed Klein bottle".
[For those who have it, this is the
"spedial topological homeomorphism"
that's discussed in AoK.]
"multi-Mobius-ed": Like a bunch of
Mobius strips, intermapped, still having
only a single surface.
This mapping is what facilitates handling
of the problem of "being on the inside,
looking out", which is 'just' a big Dir-
And, when one looks at the gross
Neuroanatomy, one can literally see
this "multi-Mobius-ed Klein bottle"
in the great decussations, commisures,
and that it can only extend "all the way
The "can only"-ness is visible in the
way that the great decussations are
ordered with respect to the cerebellum,
the outputs of which are entirely-inhib-
So the neural Topology =must= be
evrywhere-ordered to function in
accord with the easily-visible [veri-
fied] action of the cerebellum.
If such were not the case, then, to
the degree that it is not, the cerebellum
would be rendered non-functional,
which would be readily-apparent in
[Yes, there is a =lot= more in the
analysis that's been done, but the
above is all that's necessary to
Prove everything, at all scales.]
"That's my position, and I'm stickin'
to it. :-]
=Finally!=, "a Round TUIT" :-]
Cheers, Drs. Norman and Kirkcaldie,
ken [k. p. collins]