"Peter F" <effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:fvNtd.43$Al6.1671 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
>> [Can only gamble on the existence of an audience that might accEPT and enjoy
> my homeopathic doses of etymological "turDgidness"
> and otherwise 'light-making' (ameliorating of adverse but insight-providing
> thematic subterfuges of fuzzsilly sem_antics.%-}]
IMHO, Proximaty Associations Involving Nonviable Forecasts Ultimately Languish,
BUT Future Upgrades Nevertheless Necessitate "Y?"