"Peter F" <effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:6pzzd.440$m2.20697 at nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
| "kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Nbvzd.33508$uM5.16129 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| > typo alert.
| > "kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
| > news:ZK4zd.29247$uM5.15663 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...| > | [...]
| > || The rods are much-fa[s]ter than
| > || the cones.
| An important correction that makes a significant difference :-)
| to an interesting and to me 'vaguely accEPTable' (_not_ 'hardly acceptable') reasoning.
|| I can confirm your reasoning by first-hand
| observations of my orienting-'reflexing' when something
| to me thoroughly known and familiar moved and was picked up by a
| most peripheral part of my field of vision.
|| This alerting effect did - no matter how repetitious the not too frequent flapping
| of that yellow raincoat outside the window to the right of me and my PC -
| reliably disrupt (by rapid "down-shifting") my "paying" (or focusing)
| a QWERTY-keyboard-pounding intellectual thinking type "actention" (or,
| IOW, the corresponding actention module's
| dominance within my "Actention Selection System").
When I wrote AoK, I deliberately focused
upon stuff that is, like what you've described,
"seeable" within "consciousness".
What you are describing is you conscious
experience of "supersystem configuration",
"active-passive phase shifting", and "dy-
namic subordinate coupling", as they are
discussed in AoK, Ap5.
I focused upon stuff like this so that folks'd
have opportunity to literally See the neural
Topology of their nervous systems function-
ing in rigorous accord with the TD E/I-min-
Unless it's pointed-out to folks, this stuff
is usually "configured"-out of "conscious-
ness" via 'just' more 'blindly'-automated
TD E/I-minimization -- which would be
a "good" thing =IFF= it were the case that
folks already understood all that's 'blindly'-
automated in-there, and the way that what
is so 'blindly'-automated 'blindly'-and-auto-
matically induces folks to Ravage one an-
This stuff is one way of looking at what NDT
is all about. NDT 'says', "Take a 'moment' to
understand this stuff so that 'you' won't 'blind-
ly'-and-automatically do stuff to others that
both hurt their Beings and which, via 'blindly'-
automated TD E/I-minimization within =their=
nervous systems, induces them to hurt your
own Being right-back."
'Course, there's a =lot= more in NDT, but
this flat-out-"seeable" stuff is important as
a "door" to folks understanding with respect
to everything else.
I enjoyed reading your example, Peter.
Cheers, ken [k. p. collins]