Hi again Ken,
"kenneth collins" <kenneth.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3bXzd.1173031$Gx4.253990 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> That we know via our Biology in no
> way delimits that which can be pre-
> sented to our Biology, for its knowing,
> via the 3-D energydynamics occurring
> within the external experiential environ-
> ments in which we are emersed.
>> And, FWIW, "uncertainty" is a Fiction
> that derives in folks in Physics not do-
> ing "the shampoo experiment", and, so,
> remaining not seeing how continuous
> energy-flow dynamics can yield indiv-
> idually-directed sub-dynamics, and, so,
> 'declaring' the observables correlated
> to the sub-dynamics to be "everything",
> when all they are is sub-sets of "every-
> thing" that are, nevertheless, continuous
> with, and within, the "everything" :-]
>> Cheers, Peter, ken [K. P. Collins]
>Only from a very in dEPTh and physics oriented overview
and philosophical perspective of "What Is going on" does
even a continuum appear jagged -- however quite Tolerably (accEPTably) so.