"BilZ0r" <BilZ0r at TAKETHISOUThotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns948183AB2CD2CBilZ0rhotmailcom at 220.127.116.11...
> ...though Ken, you still use too many 'quote'
> marks and =emphasis= lines and my personal
> favorite, references to things most haven't and
> can't see [AoK, Ap8].
BTW, "=[...]=" is just my version of
Or are you talking about the fact that
AoK remains not-Formally-Published?
I do presume that anyone who wants
to read AoK can, in fact, do so.
It's 'published' - just not in the usual
And it's sufficiently well-written, and
everything in-it sufficiently-substantiated
in the replicable experimental results.
Anyone can see that it stands Verified
by just doing the "lawnmower experiment".
It's TH that Clinches everything.
But, BilZ0r, what can one do, after asking
to be allowed to present a Gift of under-
standing, but not being permitted to do so?
It's a 'funny' thing about understanding - it
happens within individual nervous systems,
and =cannot= be 'forced' - no matter how
much one can see that understanding is of
Both NDT & TH are earth-shaking in their
But all that they are pales in significance of
the Loss to Humanity that occurred ~2000
There is the one thing in-common - folks'
ken [k. p. collins]
> "k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in news:Y7uSb.3054
> $GO6.640 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net: