Could a cell membrane provide an electromagnetic shield ?
rsn_ at _comcast.net
Thu Feb 12 08:31:28 EST 2004
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:44:47 GMT, "Glen M. Sizemore"
<gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>RN: "Perhaps in another 50 years we will all think like [Ken]..."
>GS: Especially if someone dumps a powerful psychosis-inducing drug into the
>"r norman" <rsn_ at _comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:jd5l20d11nt95du21tr7mitl2fdqsp1rc0 at 4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:11:36 GMT, "k p Collins"
>> <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
>> <snip virtually all the content>
>> >I stand on what I've posted.
>> >[I forwarned that the stuff that I discussed
>> >in my reply to your post is "too-hot", and
>> >encouraged you to not reply, so don't be
>> >'angry' with me. It's just that, where I am,
>> >Science 'moves toward' Truth.]
>> >Thank You for the work inherent in your
>> >replying, Dr. Norman.
>> >K. P. Collins
>> As I said -- I, too, stand on what I've posted. I'll continue with
>> the "traditional" way of thinking which I believe has served us so
>> fruitfully for the last 50 years of experimental neurophysiology.
>> Perhaps you are right. Perhaps in another 50 years we will all think
>> like you and wonder why we were so dense all those years. But for now
>> I remain unconvinced.
Who knows? Someday pigs may fly. Someday we will actually find WMD
in Iraq. Someday (although this one is even less likely) we may be
teaching about 3-D energy dynamics!
As a rapidly aging guy brought up in the Eisenhower era to be polite
and respectful, I find truly appalling the level of civil discourse
all too often practiced on news groups. (Not this one so much). I
think I made it pretty clear that neither I nor anyone else in the
universe believes his theories. But I didn't feel it necessary to be
rude about it.
More information about the Neur-sci