Some amphetamine affinities

k p Collins kpaulc at [----------]earthlink.net
Mon Feb 16 02:29:28 EST 2004


I'm 'curious' - are folks waiting for me to
respond?

Everything I have to say about Neuropharmacology
has been in AoK, Ap9 all along ["functional multiplexing"]

ken [k. p. collins]

"Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bd4aa781bf9d87df02e2116313417a19 at news.teranews.com...
> I'm sure it is. These drugs have been investigated for years because of
the
> abuse aspect, and I'm sure the affinities have been worked out. My guess
is
> that the people that invent compounds like this do binding studies
> immediately. I have a paper coming out soon and one of the authors is a
> chemist who makes cocaine- and methyphenidate-like drugs (he has made
> dozens), and the relative binding affinities for the various monoamine
> transporters are the first thing examined.
>
> "Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
> news:k0lu20h75hkbh14r8ssickj0koput3rq78 at 4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:27:47 GMT, "Glen M. Sizemore"
> > <gmsizemore2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > } Hmmmm........you would think that this would be easy to find on Pub
Med,
> but
> > } it isn't.
> >
> > I had the same problem. I'll bet it's all there, but not in the
> > abstracts. By now it's probably such a well known standard measure
> > that it's not stressed. Like talking about electricity without stating
> > the unit charge of an electron.
> >
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list