My 'disruptiveness'

k p Collins kpaulc at [----------]
Wed Feb 18 00:57:37 EST 2004

Hi Matt,

"mat" <mats_trash at> wrote in message
news:43525ce3.0402171001.24e4e1d2 at
> > But, it was written decades ago. It cannot
> > just be Published, now, without being re-
> > written.
> So Crick and Watson's DNA paper is tosh
> now is it?  A Sherrington or Eccles paper is
> now wrong?  If what you wrote then was
> right it will still be broadly correct today...

Their Papers were Published in 'real-time'.

I'm just 'tired' of 'jumping-through-hoops',

Cheers, ken [k. p. collins]

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list