"mat" <mats_trash at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43525ce3.0402171001.24e4e1d2 at posting.google.com...
> > But, it was written decades ago. It cannot
> > just be Published, now, without being re-
> > written.
>> So Crick and Watson's DNA paper is tosh
> now is it? A Sherrington or Eccles paper is
> now wrong? If what you wrote then was
> right it will still be broadly correct today...
Their Papers were Published in 'real-time'.
I'm just 'tired' of 'jumping-through-hoops',
Cheers, ken [k. p. collins]