An electrophysiology quesiton

Peter F. effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au
Wed Feb 18 09:49:40 EST 2004


"NMF" <nm_fournier at ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:nmsYb.4941$d34.758000 at news20.bellglobal.com...

> > As above, 'oscillations' are artifacts - not
> > information-relevant.
>
> I still don't agree.  I've read and seen too much support for these
aspects
> of neuronal processing.  Perhaps in many cases they are just epiphenomenal
> consequences of neuronal activity, but in other cases these dynamics are
> important for eliciting long-term changes in synaptic efficacy and are
> responsible for mediating important aspects of neuronal transmission.
What
> would say about the over thirty years of research evidence that have
> investigated the importance of theta-range oscillations within the
> hippocampus?

Again please check out how this "epiphenomenon" is used and interpreted by
Janov.

www.primaltherapy.com

Could not be much more interesting!
IMHO,. that is. %-}

Perhaps you, NMF, could become interested enough to contribute to the
research being done there(?)

Regards,

P





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list