About Ken [was: Could a cell membrane provide an electromagnetic shield]

Doktor DynaSoar targeting at OMCL.mil
Sun Feb 22 19:30:23 EST 2004


On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 06:17:17 GMT, "k p  Collins"
<kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:

} Ho, ho, ho.
} 
} I stand on what =I've= posted.

Including telling someone that calculation of correlation dimension
from an arbitrary time series  requires consideration of brain
topology?

} [Hoping that your Ethics at targeting[at]OMCL.mil is
} better than your posting 'ethics' :-]

We've already touched on where I'm at. I don't think we need to
discuss the nature of ethics with respect to Orbital Mind Control
Lasers, Inc., do we?


} K. P. Collins
} 
} "Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
} news:f6dg301ommds7bcucvjel889d30hc61200 at 4ax.com...
} > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 03:10:23 GMT, "k p  Collins"
} > <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
} >
} > } > } I stand on what I've posted.
} > } >
} > } > I know. You apparently purposely tried to mislead someone asking a
} > } > question about calculation of correlation dimension by rattling off
} > } > nonsense about the brain. It was wrong. You stand by that, and I see
} > } > to that.
} > }
} > } No, you don't.
} >
} > You're wrong. I'm doing precisely that.
} >
} > } You 'see' what you 'presumed'.
} >
} > I see that I've cut and pasted your own words from your own messages
} > and proven you've purposely misled someone by posting extraneous
} > information as though it were a response to their question. It's all
} > in the archive. I can do it again. I can ever repost the entire thread
} > and document each step of your retreat from taking responsibility for
} > your own words and behavior.
} >
} > } 'go away'.
} >
} > When you stand on what you've posted and admit that you did what the
} > evidence shows, we can move on from there. But I'm not going anywhere.
} >
} 




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list