Placebo process caught in the act plain, for all to see!
m.kirkcaldie at removethis.unsw.edu.au
Mon Feb 23 19:16:03 EST 2004
In article <iyl_b.18156$hm4.12657 at newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
> I stand on what =I've= discussed [not caring
> to discuss the rest].
Ken, do you reckon we could just take it as read that you stand on what
you've posted and discussed, instead of you needing to tell us that you
stand on what you've posted every ten minutes? Dogmatism is not a
substitute for reasoned argument, nor is it impressive.
If someone disagrees with you, responding that you stand on what you've
posted contributes nothing except to inform us that you stand on what
you've posted; since you've posted it, we will assume you stand on what
you've posted, unless you happen to notify us that you DON'T stand on
what you've posted.
More information about the Neur-sci