"Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
news:bg5q30tnfbu3birr4uruhpl0tfh23k32ss at 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:09:31 GMT, "k p Collins"
> <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote:
>> } "Doktor DynaSoar" <targeting at OMCL.mil> wrote in message
> } news:ri2o3055amj2oo5ui82mcbgg5gocq3nctm at 4ax.com...> } > [...]
> } The Best-way is in-person.
> } Since you're hooked-up with the NIH,
> } and, since you feel so strongly that it's
> } necessary to 'defend truth', why don't
> } you use your 'connections' to get me a
> } Grant, from the NIH, that would cov-
> } er the costs inherent in my coming to
> } the NIH to show folks at the NIH any-
> } thing that they'd like to be shown?
>> Let me answer by analogy:
>> Why don't you buy me a car?
>> You can apply for an NIH grant just like
> anyone else can.
Back when I checked-into this, I was
told that Grants were not given to
> } I'm 'curious'. Have you read AoK?
>> No. And I'm pretty sure you don't want me to.
I'll be happy to send you a copy, gratis,
and just as happy to hear anything [ex-
cept comments on it's 'style'] you have to
say about anything that's in-it [the text is
a brief summary of Experimental results
cited in AoK].
The fundamentals that are treated in-it
will stand as Incontrovertible Truth, for
all 'time' [or at least until evolutionary
dynamics alter the very-fundamental
It contains the stuff I've been discussing, with
respect to the globally-integrated neural
Topology. It's only 114 pages, including
citations and Index.
Please 1. read it, or 2. stop interfering with
the Work I do here in bionet.neuroscience.
K. P. Collins