A Theory of Neuropeptides?

Peter F. effectivespamblock at ozemail.com.au
Fri Jan 9 20:05:46 EST 2004


"k p Collins" <kpaulc@[----------]earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:woyLb.180$i4.62 at newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...

<snip> .... folks have
> been mucking-up nervous systems' functioning by
> flooding them with this or that that can make it
> past the blood-brain 'barrier', without understanding
> what they're doing.

Agree!

>
> I'm 'angry' because NDT does what they propose
> to do, but don't, yet they've been interfering with
> the coming-forward of NDT's understanding.

Ken,
I am with you all the way on this one -- and most of the way on most other
points you make as well!

[However, this does not mean that I am going to stop seeking to
simultaneously satisfy myself AND serve you by supplying counter-balancing
counter-points to parts of your philosophical and theoretical position;
Especially parts that dischord with my EPT position of omniscientific
opinion -- of course ;-) ]

We'd better watch ourselves, or else we might form a murderous mob against
some people of the medical profession. ;-\
[N.B. That was *mostly* just a joke.;-)]

P





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list